SEC Filings

10-Q
ENVISION HEALTHCARE CORP filed this Form 10-Q on 11/03/2017
Entire Document
 
Item 1. Financial Statements - (continued)


In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which changed how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees by requiring companies to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted this standard effective January 1, 2017 and determined there were no unrecognized tax benefits which required reclassification from additional paid in capital to retained earnings. As a result of the adoption, the Company has recognized an expense of $2.2 million associated with the awards that were either exercised or vested during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The impact of the adoption for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was an expense of $0.1 million.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),” which requires entities to show the changes in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years and is to be adopted retrospectively. The Company has not yet determined the impact this ASU will have on the Company's cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) - Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. The Company does not believe the impact of this ASU will be material to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure an impairment charge. Instead, companies will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company has not yet determined the impact this ASU will have on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

(2) Variable Interest Entities

GAAP requires variable interest entities (VIEs) to be consolidated if an entity’s interest in the VIE is a controlling financial interest. Under the variable interest model, a controlling financial interest is determined based on which entity, if any, has (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impacts the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligations to absorb the losses that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Company performs ongoing reassessments of (i) whether entities previously evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become VIEs, based on certain triggering events, and therefore would be subject to the VIE consolidation framework, and (ii) whether changes in the facts and circumstances regarding the Company’s involvement with a VIE cause the Company’s consolidation conclusion to change. The consolidation status of the VIEs with which the Company is involved may change as a result of such reassessments. Changes in consolidation status are applied prospectively with assets and liabilities of a newly consolidated VIE initially recorded at fair value.

Physician Services Segment

The physician services segment structures its contractual arrangements for services in various ways. In most states, a wholly owned subsidiary contracts with hospitals to provide management services. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries along with the accounts of affiliated professional corporations (PCs) with which the Company has management arrangements. The Company's agreements with these PCs provide that the term of the arrangements is permanent, subject only to termination by the Company, except in the case of gross negligence, fraud or bankruptcy of the Company. The PC structure is necessary in states which prohibit the corporate practice of medicine but this structure is utilized by the Company in the majority of its physician practices regardless of the state where the PC operates. The arrangements are captive in nature as a majority of the outstanding voting equity instruments of the PCs are owned by nominee shareholders appointed at the sole discretion of the Company. The nominee shareholder is a medical doctor who is generally a senior corporate employee of the Company. The Company has a contractual right to transfer the ownership of the PCs at any time to any person it designates as the nominee

8