Fourth quarter net income of $314 million, earnings per diluted
share of $0.33
-
4Q11 net income available to common shareholders of $305 million, or
$0.33 per diluted common share, vs. $373 million, or $0.40 per share,
in 3Q11 and $270 million, or $0.33 per share in 4Q10
-
4Q11 return on assets of 1.1%
-
4Q11 return on average common equity of 9.5%; return on average
tangible common equity* of 11.9%
-
Full year EPS of $1.18, up 87% compared with 2010; 2011 included
$153 million, or $0.17 per share, of TARP discount accretion
recorded in 1Q11
-
Pre-provision net revenue (PPNR)* of $473 million reflected:
-
Net interest income (FTE) of $920 million, up 2% sequentially; net
interest margin 3.67%; period end portfolio loans up 2%
sequentially driven by 5% growth in C&I loans
-
Noninterest income of $550 million compared with $665 million in
the prior quarter; decline largely due to $54 million charge to a
swap liability related to our previous sale of class B Visa
shares, about $30 million lower debit interchange revenue due to
change in debit interchange regulations, $22 million lower
mortgage banking revenue, and $21 million lower net investment
securities gains
-
Noninterest expense of $993 million, up 5% sequentially, driven by
a $14 million litigation reserve charge related to card
association membership and higher compensation and benefits
expense which included a $10 million sequential increase largely
due to the impact of a higher stock price on long term equity
awards, $6 million in pension settlement expense, and the effect
of higher loan volumes
-
Credit trends remain favorable
-
4Q11 net charge-offs of $239 million (1.19% of loans and leases),
versus 3Q11 NCOs of $262 million and 4Q10 NCOs of $356 million;
lowest NCO level since 4Q07; 4Q11 provision expense of $55 million
compared with 3Q11 provision of $87 million and 4Q10 provision of
$166 million
-
Loan loss allowance declined $184 million, similar to 3Q11 and
4Q10, due to improvement in credit results; allowance to loan
ratio of 2.78%, 124% of nonperforming assets, 157% of
nonperforming loans and leases, and 2.4 times 4Q11 annualized net
charge-offs
-
Total nonperforming assets of $2.0 billion including held-for-sale
declined $187 million or 9% sequentially; nonperforming assets
excluding held-for-sale of $1.8 billion declined $128 million or
7%; lowest levels since 1Q08
-
NPA ratio of 2.23% down 21 bps from 3Q11, NPL ratio of 1.76% down
17 bps from 3Q11; gross NPL inflows of $396 million down 5%
sequentially
-
Total delinquencies (includes 30-89 days past dues and over 90
days past dues) down 13% sequentially
-
No direct European sovereign exposure; total exposure to European
peripheral borrowers less than $0.2 billion; total exposure to
European banks less than $0.2 billion**
-
Strong capital ratios; exceed fully phased-in Basel III proposed
standards
-
Tier 1 common ratio 9.34%*, up 1 bp sequentially (pro forma***
~9.7% on a fully-phased in Basel III-adjusted basis, estimated
among highest of large cap U.S. banks)
-
Tier 1 capital ratio 11.91%, Total capital ratio 16.08%, Leverage
ratio 11.10%
-
Tangible common equity ratio* of 8.68% excluding unrealized
gains/losses; 9.04% including unrealized gains/losses
-
Book value per share of $13.92, tangible book value per share* of
$11.25
-
Tangible book value per share growth 2% from 3Q11, 13% from 4Q10
* Non-GAAP measure; See Reg. G reconciliation on page 33 in Exhibit
99.1 of 8-k filing dated 1/20/12
** “European” includes non-Eurozone countries; “European peripheral”
includes Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain
*** Current estimate (non-GAAP), subject to final rule-making and
clarification by U.S. banking regulators; currently assumes unrealized
securities gains are included in common equity for purposes of this
calculation
CINCINNATI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 20, 2012--
Fifth Third Bancorp (Nasdaq: FITB) today reported full year 2011 net
income of $1.3 billion, compared with net income of $753 million in
2010. After preferred dividends, 2011 net income available to common
shareholders was $1.1 billion, or $1.18 per diluted share, compared with
2010 net income available to common shareholders of $503 million, or
$0.63 per diluted share. Preferred dividends in the first quarter of
2011 included $153 million, or $0.17 per diluted share, of discount
accretion primarily related to the repayment of TARP preferred stock, as
well as $15 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, of contractual dividend
payments on the TARP preferred stock. TARP preferred dividends in 2010
were $215 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, including $170 million of
contractual dividend payments and $45 million of discount accretion.
Fourth quarter 2011 net income was $314 million, compared with net
income of $381 million in the third quarter of 2011 and net income of
$333 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. After preferred dividends,
fourth quarter 2011 net income available to common shareholders was $305
million or $0.33 per diluted share, compared with third quarter net
income of $373 million or $0.40 per diluted share, and net income of
$270 million or $0.33 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2010.
As previously announced, fourth quarter 2011 results included a $54
million pre-tax charge to noninterest income related to changes in the
fair value of a swap liability that Fifth Third entered into in
conjunction with its sale of Class B Visa shares in 2009 (compared with
a $17 million charge in the third quarter of 2011 and a $5 million
charge in the fourth quarter of 2010) and a $14 million charge in
noninterest expense to increase litigation reserves associated with
bankcard association membership. Fourth quarter 2011 results also
included $10 million in positive valuation adjustments on Vantiv LLC
puts and warrants compared with $3 million in positive valuation
adjustments in both the third quarter of 2011 and the fourth quarter of
2010, and investment securities gains of $5 million compared with gains
of $26 million in the third quarter of 2011 and gains of $21 million in
the fourth quarter of 2010. Third quarter 2011 results also included $28
million of expense related to the termination of certain FHLB borrowings
and hedging transactions. Fourth quarter 2010 results also included a
$17 million charge related to the early extinguishment of $1.0 billion
in FHLB borrowings.
Earnings Highlights
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Earnings ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Bancorp
|
|
$314
|
|
$381
|
|
$337
|
|
$265
|
|
$333
|
|
(18%)
|
|
(6%)
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$305
|
|
$373
|
|
$328
|
|
$88
|
|
$270
|
|
(18%)
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, basic
|
|
0.33
|
|
0.41
|
|
0.36
|
|
0.10
|
|
0.34
|
|
(20%)
|
|
(3%)
|
|
|
Earnings per share, diluted
|
|
0.33
|
|
0.40
|
|
0.35
|
|
0.10
|
|
0.33
|
|
(18%)
|
|
(.0%)
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
0.08
|
|
0.08
|
|
0.06
|
|
0.06
|
|
0.01
|
|
0%
|
|
700%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
1.08%
|
|
1.34%
|
|
1.22%
|
|
0.97%
|
|
1.18%
|
|
(19%)
|
|
(8%)
|
|
|
Return on average common equity
|
|
9.5
|
|
11.9
|
|
11.0
|
|
3.1
|
|
10.4
|
|
(20%)
|
|
(9%)
|
|
|
Return on average tangible common equity
|
|
11.9
|
|
14.9
|
|
14.0
|
|
4.2
|
|
13.9
|
|
(20%)
|
|
(14%)
|
|
|
Tier I capital
|
|
11.91
|
|
11.96
|
|
11.93
|
|
12.20
|
|
13.89
|
|
0%
|
|
(14%)
|
|
|
Tier I common equity
|
|
9.34
|
|
9.33
|
|
9.20
|
|
8.99
|
|
7.48
|
|
0%
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Net interest margin (a)
|
|
3.67
|
|
3.65
|
|
3.62
|
|
3.71
|
|
3.75
|
|
1%
|
|
(2%)
|
|
|
Efficiency (a)
|
|
67.5
|
|
60.4
|
|
59.1
|
|
62.5
|
|
62.6
|
|
12%
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
919,804
|
|
919,779
|
|
919,818
|
|
918,728
|
|
796,273
|
|
0%
|
|
16%
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
914,997
|
|
914,947
|
|
914,601
|
|
880,830
|
|
791,072
|
|
0%
|
|
16%
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
956,349
|
|
955,490
|
|
955,478
|
|
894,841
|
|
836,225
|
|
0%
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis
|
|
|
|
“Fifth Third’s 2011 results clearly demonstrated continued improvement,
with net income available to common shareholders more than doubling
compared with last year,” said Kevin T. Kabat, president and CEO of
Fifth Third Bancorp. “We’re growing our loan portfolio, credit trends
continued to improve, and we continue to maintain a strong capital
position.
“Throughout 2011, we have seen solid expansion of the loan portfolio
through our lending activities, although demand remained relatively
soft, with total loan growth of 5 percent from a year ago. The fourth
quarter saw a significant pick-up in demand and loan growth, with end of
period total loan growth of 2 percent, including 5 percent in C&I
lending which continues to be a strength for us.
“Growth in loans, along with continued runoff in excess CD balances,
drove an expansion in net interest income and net interest margin, which
were up sequentially by 2 percent and 2 basis points, respectively.
Noninterest income trends reflected the impact of several fourth quarter
developments, including the implementation of new debit interchange
regulations, a charge related to our previous sale of Visa, Inc. shares,
and lower mortgage banking revenue relative to last quarter’s strong
results. Fourth quarter expenses were elevated due to a litigation
reserve charge related to bankcard association membership and higher
compensation expense, which included several unusual items as well as
the impact of strong loan production volumes, particularly mortgages, on
incentives and fulfillment costs.
“Credit trends continued to be favorable, with net charge-offs down 9
percent sequentially to 1.19 percent of loans and leases, the lowest
since 2007. Nonperforming assets (excluding held-for-sale) declined 7
percent sequentially, and delinquency trends remain consistent with
pre-crisis levels.
“While regulatory headwinds remain for the industry, as we look to 2012,
we believe Fifth Third Bank is well-positioned to continue to outperform
other banking competitors.”
Income Statement Highlights
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)
|
|
$920
|
|
$902
|
|
$869
|
|
$884
|
|
$919
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
55
|
|
87
|
|
113
|
|
168
|
|
166
|
|
(36
|
%)
|
|
(67
|
%)
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
550
|
|
665
|
|
656
|
|
584
|
|
656
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
|
(16
|
%)
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
993
|
|
946
|
|
901
|
|
918
|
|
987
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
Income before income taxes (taxable equivalent)
|
|
422
|
|
534
|
|
511
|
|
382
|
|
422
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
-
|
|
|
(20
|
%)
|
|
|
Applicable income taxes
|
|
104
|
|
149
|
|
169
|
|
112
|
|
83
|
|
(30
|
%)
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
314
|
|
381
|
|
337
|
|
265
|
|
334
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Bancorp
|
|
314
|
|
381
|
|
337
|
|
265
|
|
333
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
|
Dividends on preferred stock
|
|
9
|
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
177
|
|
63
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
(86
|
%)
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
305
|
|
373
|
|
328
|
|
88
|
|
270
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
Earnings per share, diluted
|
|
$0.33
|
|
$0.40
|
|
$0.35
|
|
$0.10
|
|
$0.33
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
(
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Interest Income ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income (taxable equivalent)
|
|
$1,061
|
|
|
$1,059
|
|
|
$1,050
|
|
|
$1,065
|
|
|
$1,109
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
141
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
(10
|
%)
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
|
|
Net interest income (taxable equivalent)
|
|
$920
|
|
|
$902
|
|
|
$869
|
|
|
$884
|
|
|
$919
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield on interest-earning assets (taxable equivalent)
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
|
Yield on interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
1.02
|
%
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (taxable equivalent)
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent)
|
|
3.67
|
%
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
3.71
|
%
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, including held for sale
|
|
$82,278
|
|
|
$80,013
|
|
|
$79,153
|
|
|
$79,379
|
|
|
$79,148
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
Total securities and other short-term investments
|
|
17,243
|
|
|
18,142
|
|
|
17,192
|
|
|
17,290
|
|
|
18,066
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
99,521
|
|
|
98,155
|
|
|
96,345
|
|
|
96,669
|
|
|
97,214
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
71,467
|
|
|
72,473
|
|
|
72,503
|
|
|
72,372
|
|
|
72,657
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
|
Bancorp shareholders' equity
|
|
13,147
|
|
|
12,841
|
|
|
12,365
|
|
|
13,052
|
|
|
14,007
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income of $920 million on a fully taxable equivalent basis
increased $18 million from the third quarter of 2011. Interest income
increased $2 million and interest expense declined $16 million. Interest
income results reflected a $12 million increase from loans and $10
million reduction from securities. Those trends were driven by loan
growth, which more than offset the effect of lower securities balances,
lower reinvestment rates on securities given the current interest rate
environment, and lower yields on loans. Interest expense improvements
were driven by lower deposit costs, including the $16 million impact of
continued run-off of high-rate CDs and their replacement into lower
yielding products, as well as the benefit from FHLB debt termination and
swap redemptions in the third quarter of 2011. These effects were
partially offset by increased expense as a result of hedge
ineffectiveness in the fourth quarter of 2011 due to changes in the
interest rate environment.
The net interest margin was 3.67 percent, an increase of 2 bps from 3.65
percent in the previous quarter. The increase reflected the net effect
of the factors mentioned in the net interest income discussion, with net
certificate of deposit (CD) runoff contributing approximately 7 bps to
the margin and loan growth contributing 2 bps, while lower loan yields
reduced the margin by approximately 5 bps while increased hedge
ineffectiveness reduced the margin by 2 bps.
Compared with the fourth quarter of 2010, net interest income increased
$1 million and the net interest margin decreased 8 bps, which was
largely the result of lower loan and investment securities yields,
partially offset by higher average loan balances, run-off in
higher-priced CDs, and mix shift to lower cost deposit products.
Securities
Average securities and other short-term investments were $17.2 billion
in the fourth quarter of 2011 compared with $18.1 billion in the
previous quarter and $18.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2010. The
decline was related to lower reinvestment of portfolio cash flows and
lower short-term investment balances due to the repayment of FHLB
borrowings entered into during the debt ceiling crisis.
Loans
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Average Portfolio Loans and Leases ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
$29,891
|
|
$28,777
|
|
$27,909
|
|
$27,331
|
|
$26,338
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
10,262
|
|
10,050
|
|
10,394
|
|
10,685
|
|
10,985
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
(7
|
%)
|
|
|
Commercial construction
|
|
1,132
|
|
1,752
|
|
1,918
|
|
2,030
|
|
2,171
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
|
(48
|
%)
|
|
|
Commercial leases
|
|
3,351
|
|
3,300
|
|
3,349
|
|
3,364
|
|
3,314
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
Subtotal - commercial loans and leases
|
|
44,636
|
|
43,879
|
|
43,570
|
|
43,410
|
|
42,808
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
10,464
|
|
10,006
|
|
9,654
|
|
9,282
|
|
8,382
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
10,810
|
|
10,985
|
|
11,144
|
|
11,376
|
|
11,655
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
(7
|
%)
|
|
|
Automobile loans
|
|
11,696
|
|
11,445
|
|
11,188
|
|
11,070
|
|
10,825
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
Credit card
|
|
1,906
|
|
1,864
|
|
1,834
|
|
1,852
|
|
1,844
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
Other consumer loans and leases
|
|
402
|
|
441
|
|
547
|
|
646
|
|
722
|
|
(9
|
%)
|
|
(44
|
%)
|
|
|
Subtotal - consumer loans and leases
|
|
35,278
|
|
34,741
|
|
34,367
|
|
34,226
|
|
33,428
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
Total average loans and leases (excluding held for sale)
|
|
$79,914
|
|
$78,620
|
|
$77,937
|
|
$77,636
|
|
$76,236
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans held for sale
|
|
2,364
|
|
1,393
|
|
1,216
|
|
1,743
|
|
2,912
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
(19
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average and end of period loan and lease balances (excluding loans
held-for-sale) were up 2 percent sequentially and 5 percent from the
fourth quarter of 2010.
Average commercial portfolio loan and lease balances were up $757
million sequentially, or 2 percent, and increased $1.8 billion, or 4
percent, from the fourth quarter of 2010. Average C&I loans increased 4
percent sequentially and 13 percent compared with the fourth quarter of
2010. Average commercial mortgage and commercial construction loan
balances declined by a combined 3 percent sequentially and 13 percent
from the same period the previous year, reflecting continued low
customer demand and current underwriting standards. Commercial line
usage, on an end of period basis, was 32 percent of committed lines in
the fourth quarter versus 33 percent in both the third quarter of 2011
and the fourth quarter of 2010. The decline was primarily due to an
increase in committed lines accompanied with relatively stable usage.
Average consumer portfolio loan and lease balances were up $537 million
sequentially, or 2 percent, and increased $1.9 billion, or 6 percent,
from the fourth quarter of 2010. Average residential mortgage loans
increased 5 percent sequentially, reflecting stronger originations
during the quarter as rates remained at historically low levels, as well
as the continued retention of certain branch originated shorter-term
fixed-rate residential mortgages which totaled $476 million on an end of
period basis in the fourth quarter. Compared with the fourth quarter of
2010, average residential mortgage loans increased 25 percent and
reflected the previously mentioned retention of mortgages. Average auto
loans increased 2 percent sequentially and 8 percent year-over-year as
loan origination volumes more than offset pay-downs. The growth outlined
above was partially offset by lower home equity loan balances, which
declined 2 percent sequentially and 7 percent year-over-year due to
lower demand and production.
Average loans held-for-sale of $2.4 billion increased $971 million from
third quarter levels primarily due to the high level of mortgage
refinancing activity during the quarter. Compared with the fourth
quarter of 2010, average loans held-for-sale decreased $548 million due
to the effect of elevated mortgage refinancing activity in 2010 in the
fourth quarter 2010 mortgage loan warehouse.
Deposits
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Average Deposits ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$26,069
|
|
$23,677
|
|
$22,174
|
|
$21,582
|
|
$21,066
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
19,263
|
|
18,322
|
|
18,701
|
|
18,539
|
|
17,578
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
21,715
|
|
21,747
|
|
21,817
|
|
21,324
|
|
20,602
|
|
-
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
5,255
|
|
5,213
|
|
5,009
|
|
5,136
|
|
4,985
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
Foreign office (a)
|
|
3,325
|
|
3,255
|
|
3,805
|
|
3,580
|
|
3,733
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
(11
|
%)
|
|
|
Subtotal - Transaction deposits
|
|
75,627
|
|
72,214
|
|
71,506
|
|
70,161
|
|
67,964
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
Other time
|
|
4,960
|
|
6,008
|
|
6,738
|
|
7,363
|
|
8,490
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
|
(42
|
%)
|
|
|
Subtotal - Core deposits
|
|
80,587
|
|
78,222
|
|
78,244
|
|
77,524
|
|
76,454
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
Certificates - $100,000 and over
|
|
3,085
|
|
3,376
|
|
3,955
|
|
4,226
|
|
4,858
|
|
(9
|
%)
|
|
(36
|
%)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
16
|
|
7
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
9
|
|
147
|
%
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$83,688
|
|
$81,605
|
|
$82,201
|
|
$81,751
|
|
$81,321
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
(a) Includes commercial customer Eurodollar sweep balances for which
the Bancorp pays rates comparable to other commercial deposit
accounts.
|
|
|
|
Average core deposits increased 3 percent sequentially and 5 percent
from the fourth quarter of 2010, as transaction deposit growth was
partially offset by continued runoff of other time deposits. Average
transaction deposits, excluding other time deposits, increased 5 percent
from the third quarter of 2011 primarily driven by higher demand deposit
account (DDA) and interest checking balances. Year-over-year growth of
11 percent was driven by higher DDA, interest checking, savings, and
money market account balances.
Retail average transaction deposits increased 3 percent sequentially and
reflected higher DDA, interest checking, and money market account
balances. Growth of 12 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010 reflected
higher balances across all transaction deposit account categories.
Consumer CDs included in core deposits declined 17 percent sequentially
and 42 percent year-over-year, driven by maturities of higher-rate CDs
and customer reluctance to purchase longer CD maturities given the
current low rate environment.
Commercial average transaction deposits increased 9 percent sequentially
and 11 percent from the previous year driven by higher average account
balances. Sequential growth reflected seasonally higher inflows to DDAs
and interest checking during the quarter, partially offset by lower
money market account balances. Year-over-year growth also reflected
higher inflows to DDAs and interest checking, partially offset by lower
foreign office deposits and money market account balances. Average
public funds balances were $5.4 billion compared with $5.4 billion in
the third quarter of 2011 and $5.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Noninterest Income ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits
|
|
$136
|
|
|
$134
|
|
$126
|
|
$124
|
|
$140
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
|
|
Corporate banking revenue
|
|
82
|
|
|
87
|
|
95
|
|
86
|
|
103
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
(20
|
%)
|
|
|
Mortgage banking net revenue
|
|
156
|
|
|
178
|
|
162
|
|
102
|
|
149
|
|
(12
|
%)
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
Investment advisory revenue
|
|
90
|
|
|
92
|
|
95
|
|
98
|
|
93
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
|
|
Card and processing revenue
|
|
60
|
|
|
78
|
|
89
|
|
80
|
|
81
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
|
|
Other noninterest income
|
|
24
|
|
|
64
|
|
83
|
|
81
|
|
55
|
|
(63
|
%)
|
|
(57
|
%)
|
|
|
Securities gains, net
|
|
5
|
|
|
26
|
|
6
|
|
8
|
|
21
|
|
(81
|
%)
|
|
(76
|
%)
|
|
|
Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage
servicing rights
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
6
|
|
-
|
|
5
|
|
14
|
|
NM
|
|
NM
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$550
|
|
|
$665
|
|
$656
|
|
$584
|
|
$656
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
|
(16
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM: Not Meaningful
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income of $550 million decreased $115 million sequentially,
or 17 percent, and declined $106 million, or 16 percent, compared with
year ago results. The sequential decline was primarily driven by lower
mortgage banking net revenue, the impact of new debit interchange
regulation on interchange revenue, lower net securities gains, and the
effect of valuation adjustments on the Visa total return swap.
Fourth quarter 2011 noninterest income results included a $54 million
charge related to the increase in fair value of the liability related to
the total return swap entered into as part of the 2009 sale of Visa,
Inc. Class B shares; this compares with a $17 million charge in the
third quarter of 2011 and a $5 million charge in the fourth quarter of
2010. Fourth quarter 2011 results also included a $10 million positive
valuation adjustment on warrants and puts related to the 2009 sale of a
51 percent interest in our processing business, compared with $3 million
in positive valuation adjustments on these instruments in both the third
quarter of 2011 and the fourth quarter of 2010. Excluding these items,
as well as investment securities gains in all periods, noninterest
income decreased $64 million, or 10 percent, from the previous quarter.
On a year-over-year basis, noninterest income, excluding the items
mentioned above, decreased $48 million, or 8 percent, primarily due to
lower debit interchange revenue and mortgage banking revenue.
Service charges on deposits of $136 million increased 1 percent from the
third quarter and decreased 3 percent compared with the same quarter
last year. Retail service charges were flat sequentially. Compared with
the fourth quarter of 2010, retail service charges declined 7 percent
largely due to the implementation of new overdraft regulations and
overdraft policies. Commercial service charges increased 2 percent
sequentially due to reductions in earnings credit rates and account
growth and were consistent with results from a year ago.
Corporate banking revenue of $82 million decreased 5 percent from the
third quarter of 2011 and decreased 20 percent from the same period last
year. The sequential decline was primarily driven by lower foreign
exchange, interest rate derivative, and lease related fees. The
year-over-year decline was driven by these factors as well as strong
syndication fees and institutional sales revenue results in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Mortgage banking net revenue was $156 million in the fourth quarter of
2011, a 12 percent decrease from the third quarter of 2011 and a 5
percent increase from the fourth quarter of 2010. Fourth quarter 2011
originations were $7.1 billion, compared with $4.5 billion in the
previous quarter and $7.4 billion in the fourth quarter of 2010. Fourth
quarter 2011 originations resulted in gains of $152 million on mortgages
sold compared with gains of $119 million during the previous quarter and
$158 million during the fourth quarter of 2010. Mortgage servicing fees
this quarter were $58 million, compared with $59 million in both the
third quarter of 2011 and the fourth quarter of 2010. Mortgage banking
net revenue is also affected by net servicing asset value adjustments,
which include mortgage servicing rights (MSR) amortization and MSR
valuation adjustments (including mark-to-market adjustments on
free-standing derivatives used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio).
These net servicing asset valuation adjustments were negative $54
million in the fourth quarter of 2011 (reflecting MSR amortization of
$47 million and MSR valuation adjustments of negative $7 million); net
zero in the third quarter of 2011 (MSR amortization of $34 million and
MSR valuation adjustments of positive $34 million); and negative $67
million in the fourth quarter of 2010 (MSR amortization of $47 million
and MSR valuation adjustments of negative $20 million). The
mortgage-servicing asset, net of the valuation reserve, was $681 million
at year end on a servicing portfolio of $57 billion.
Net losses on securities held as non-qualifying hedges for the MSR
portfolio were $3 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared with
net gains of $6 million in the third quarter of 2011 and $14 million in
the fourth quarter of 2010.
Investment advisory revenue of $90 million decreased 2 percent
sequentially and 3 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010. Sequential
and year-over-year declines were driven by lower securities and
brokerage revenue, institutional trust fees, and mutual fund fees
largely due to fluctuations in equity and bond markets, partially offset
by higher private client service revenue due to increased production.
Card and processing revenue was $60 million in the fourth quarter of
2011, a decrease of 24 percent sequentially and 26 percent from the
fourth quarter of 2010. The sequential and year-over-year declines were
driven by the approximately $30 million impact of the recently enacted
debit interchange legislation, partially offset by increased transaction
volumes and initial mitigation activity.
Other noninterest income totaled $24 million in the fourth quarter of
2011, compared with $64 million in the previous quarter and $55 million
in the fourth quarter of 2010. Other noninterest income includes changes
in income related to the valuation of the total return swap entered into
as part of the 2009 sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares, revenue from our
equity interest in the processing business, and effects of the valuation
of warrants and puts related to the processing business sale. For
periods ending December 31, 2011, September 30, 2011, and December 31,
2010, reductions in income related to the Visa, Inc. total return swap
were $54 million, $17 million, and $5 million, respectively; revenue
from our processing business equity interest was $25 million, $17
million, and $8 million, respectively; and warrant/put valuation
adjustments were a benefit of $10 million, $3 million, and $3 million,
respectively. Excluding these items, other noninterest income decreased
$18 million from the previous quarter and $6 million from the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Net credit-related costs recognized in other noninterest income were $33
million in the fourth quarter of 2011 versus $25 million last quarter
and $34 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. Fourth quarter 2011
results included $9 million of net gains on sales of commercial loans
held-for-sale and $18 million of fair value charges on commercial loans
held-for-sale, as well as $22 million of losses on other real estate
owned (OREO). Third quarter 2011 results included $3 million of net
gains on sales of commercial loans held-for-sale and $6 million of fair
value charges on commercial loans held-for-sale, as well as $21 million
of losses on OREO. Fourth quarter 2010 results included net losses of
$21 million on the sale of loans held-for-sale, $35 million of fair
value charges on commercial loans held-for-sale, and $19 million of
losses on OREO.
Net gains on investment securities were $5 million in the fourth quarter
of 2011, compared with investment securities gains of $26 million in the
previous quarter and $21 million in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Seq
|
|
Yr/Yr
|
|
|
Noninterest Expense ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and incentives
|
|
$393
|
|
$369
|
|
$365
|
|
$351
|
|
$385
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
84
|
|
70
|
|
79
|
|
97
|
|
73
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
Net occupancy expense
|
|
79
|
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
77
|
|
76
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
Technology and communications
|
|
48
|
|
48
|
|
48
|
|
45
|
|
52
|
|
-
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
|
|
Equipment expense
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
28
|
|
29
|
|
32
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
|
(13
|
%)
|
|
|
Card and processing expense
|
|
28
|
|
34
|
|
29
|
|
29
|
|
26
|
|
(17
|
%)
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
Other noninterest expense
|
|
334
|
|
322
|
|
277
|
|
290
|
|
343
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
(3
|
%)
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
$993
|
|
$946
|
|
$901
|
|
$918
|
|
$987
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense of $993 million increased 5 percent from the third
quarter of 2011 and increased 1 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010.
Fourth quarter 2011 expenses included a $14 million addition to
litigation reserves related to bankcard association membership and $5
million in other litigation reserve additions. Third quarter 2011
expenses included $28 million of costs related to the termination of
certain FHLB borrowings and hedging transactions. Fourth quarter 2010
included $17 million of expenses related to the termination of $1
billion in FHLB funding. Excluding these items, noninterest expense
increased 6 percent from the third quarter of 2011 and was flat compared
with the fourth quarter of 2010, driven by higher compensation and
benefits expense, with the former driven by higher loan volume
fulfillment costs and incentives, particularly mortgage, as well as the
effect of a higher stock price on long term equity awards, and the
latter driven by $6 million of annual pension settlement expense.
Credit costs related to problem assets recorded as noninterest expense
totaled $44 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared with $45
million in the third quarter of 2011 and $52 million in the fourth
quarter of 2010. Fourth quarter credit-related expenses included
provisioning for mortgage repurchases of $18 million, compared with $19
million in the third quarter and $20 million a year ago. (Realized
mortgage repurchase losses were $17 million in the fourth quarter of
2011, compared with $31 million last quarter and $23 million in the
fourth quarter of 2010.) Provision for unfunded commitments was a
benefit of $6 million in the current quarter, compared with a benefit of
$10 million last quarter and a benefit of $4 million a year ago.
Derivative valuation adjustments related to customer credit risk were a
positive $5 million this quarter versus $4 million in expense last
quarter and positive $1 million a year ago. OREO expense was $8 million
this quarter, compared with $7 million last quarter and $11 million a
year ago. Other problem asset-related expenses were $28 million in the
fourth quarter, compared with $25 million the previous quarter and $27
million in the same period last year.
Credit Quality
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Total net losses charged off ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
($62
|
)
|
|
($55
|
)
|
|
($76
|
)
|
|
($83
|
)
|
|
($85
|
)
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
Commercial construction loans
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
Commercial leases
|
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
Automobile loans
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
Credit card
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
Other consumer loans and leases
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Total net losses charged off
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
41
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
Total net losses charged off
|
|
($239
|
)
|
|
($262
|
)
|
|
($304
|
)
|
|
($367
|
)
|
|
($356
|
)
|
|
|
Ratios (annualized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses charged off as a percent of average loans and leases
(excluding held for sale)
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
1.56
|
%
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs were $239 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, or 119
bps of average loans on an annualized basis. Net charge-offs were 9
percent lower than third quarter 2011 net charge-offs of $262 million,
and 33 percent lower than fourth quarter 2010 net charge-offs of $356
million.
Commercial net charge-offs were $113 million, or 100 bps, down $23
million versus $136 million, or 123 bps, in the third quarter. C&I net
losses were $62 million compared with net losses of $55 million in the
previous quarter. Commercial mortgage net losses totaled $47 million,
unchanged from the third quarter. Commercial construction net losses
were $4 million, compared with net losses of $35 million in the prior
quarter. Net losses on residential builder and developer portfolio loans
across the C&I and commercial real estate categories totaled $2 million.
Originations of homebuilder / developer loans were suspended in 2007 and
the remaining portfolio balance is $512 million, down from a peak of
$3.3 billion in the second quarter of 2008.
Consumer net charge-offs were $126 million, or 143 bps, flat
sequentially. Net charge-offs on residential mortgage loans in the
portfolio were $36 million, unchanged from the previous quarter. Home
equity net charge-offs were $50 million, versus $53 million in the third
quarter. Net losses on brokered home equity loans represented 34 percent
of third quarter home equity losses; such loans are 14 percent of the
total home equity portfolio. The home equity portfolio included $1.5
billion of brokered loans, down from a peak of $2.6 billion in 2007;
originations of these loans were discontinued in 2007. Net charge-offs
in the auto portfolio of $13 million increased $1 million seasonally
from the prior quarter. Net losses on consumer credit card loans were
$21 million, up $3 million from the previous quarter. Net charge-offs in
other consumer loans were $6 million, down $1 million from the previous
quarter.
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses ($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning
|
|
$2,439
|
|
|
$2,614
|
|
|
$2,805
|
|
|
$3,004
|
|
|
$3,194
|
|
|
|
Total net losses charged off
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
55
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, ending
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments, beginning
|
|
187
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitments
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments, ending
|
|
181
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
181
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses
|
|
$2,436
|
|
|
$2,626
|
|
|
$2,811
|
|
|
$3,016
|
|
|
$3,231
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of loans and leases
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
|
|
As a percent of nonperforming loans and leases (a)
|
|
157
|
%
|
|
158
|
%
|
|
160
|
%
|
|
170
|
%
|
|
179
|
%
|
|
|
As a percent of nonperforming assets (a)
|
|
124
|
%
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
132
|
%
|
|
138
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Excludes non accrual loans and leases in loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses totaled $55 million in the fourth
quarter of 2011, down $32 million from the third quarter of 2011 and
down $111 million from the fourth quarter of 2010. The allowance for
loan and lease losses declined $184 million, reflecting continued
improvement in credit trends, a similar reduction to that recorded in
recent quarters. This allowance represented 2.78 percent of total loans
and leases outstanding as of year end, compared with 3.08 percent last
quarter, and represented 157 percent of nonperforming loans and leases,
124 percent of nonperforming assets, and 238 percent of third quarter
annualized net charge-offs.
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
Nonperforming Assets and Delinquent Loans ($ in millions)
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
Nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans (a)
|
|
$408
|
|
$449
|
|
$485
|
|
$477
|
|
$473
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
358
|
|
353
|
|
417
|
|
415
|
|
407
|
|
Commercial construction loans
|
|
123
|
|
151
|
|
147
|
|
159
|
|
182
|
|
Commercial leases
|
|
9
|
|
13
|
|
16
|
|
11
|
|
11
|
|
Residential mortgage loans
|
|
134
|
|
142
|
|
145
|
|
140
|
|
152
|
|
Home equity
|
|
25
|
|
25
|
|
26
|
|
24
|
|
23
|
|
Automobile loans
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Other consumer loans and leases (a)
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
60
|
|
84
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans and leases
|
|
$1,058
|
|
$1,134
|
|
$1,240
|
|
$1,287
|
|
$1,333
|
|
Restructured loans and leases - commercial (nonaccrual)
|
|
160
|
|
189
|
|
188
|
|
149
|
|
141
|
|
Restructured loans and leases - consumer (nonaccrual)
|
|
220
|
|
215
|
|
211
|
|
209
|
|
206
|
|
Total nonperforming loans and leases
|
|
$1,438
|
|
$1,538
|
|
$1,639
|
|
$1,645
|
|
$1,680
|
|
Repossessed personal property
|
|
14
|
|
17
|
|
15
|
|
20
|
|
27
|
|
Other real estate owned (b)
|
|
364
|
|
389
|
|
434
|
|
461
|
|
467
|
|
Total nonperforming assets (c)
|
|
$1,816
|
|
$1,944
|
|
$2,088
|
|
$2,126
|
|
$2,174
|
|
Nonaccrual loans held for sale
|
|
131
|
|
171
|
|
147
|
|
184
|
|
247
|
|
Restructured loans - commercial (nonaccrual) held for sale
|
|
7
|
|
26
|
|
29
|
|
32
|
|
47
|
|
Total nonperforming assets including loans held for sale
|
|
$1,954
|
|
$2,141
|
|
$2,264
|
|
$2,342
|
|
$2,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured Consumer loans and leases (accrual)
|
|
$1,612
|
|
$1,601
|
|
$1,593
|
|
$1,573
|
|
$1,560
|
|
Restructured Commercial loans and leases (accrual)
|
|
$390
|
|
$349
|
|
$266
|
|
$243
|
|
$228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and leases 90 days past due
|
|
$200
|
|
$274
|
|
$279
|
|
$266
|
|
$274
|
|
Nonperforming loans and leases as a percent of portfolio loans,
leases and other assets, including other real estate owned (c)
|
|
1.76%
|
|
1.93%
|
|
2.09%
|
|
2.11%
|
|
2.15%
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a percent of portfolio loans, leases and
other assets, including other real estate owned (c)
|
|
2.23%
|
|
2.44%
|
|
2.66%
|
|
2.73%
|
|
2.79%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Nonaccrual loans and leases at December 31, 2010 reflect a
reclassification of $84 million in nonperforming loans from
commercial and industrial loans to other consumer loans and leases
which occurred after the Bancorp's Form 8-K was filed on January 19,
2011. This reclassification was primarily a result of the
determination that consumer loans obtained in the foreclosure of a
commercial loan were more appropriately categorized as other
consumer loans and leases in accordance with regulatory guidelines.
|
|
(b) Excludes government insured advances.
|
|
(c) Does not include nonaccrual loans held-for-sale.
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets, including loans held-for-sale, were $2.0
billion, a decline of $187 million, or 9 percent, from the previous
quarter. Nonperforming assets held-for-investment (NPAs) at year end
were $1.8 billion or 2.23 percent of total loans, leases and OREO, and
decreased $128 million, or 7 percent, from the previous quarter.
Nonperforming loans held-for-investment (NPLs) at year end were $1.4
billion or 1.76 percent of total loans, leases and OREO, and decreased
$100 million or 7 percent from the third quarter.
Commercial portfolio NPAs at year end were $1.3 billion, or 2.92 percent
of commercial loans, leases and OREO, and decreased $136 million, or 9
percent, from the third quarter. Commercial portfolio NPLs were $1.1
billion, or 2.31 percent of commercial loans and leases, and decreased
$96 million from last quarter. Commercial construction portfolio NPAs
were $179 million, a decline of $58 million from the previous quarter.
Commercial mortgage portfolio NPAs were $637 million, up $7 million from
the prior quarter. Commercial real estate loans in Michigan and Florida
represented 46 percent of commercial real estate NPAs and 38 percent of
our total commercial real estate portfolio. C&I portfolio NPAs of $509
million decreased $79 million from the previous quarter. Within the
overall commercial loan portfolio, residential real estate builder and
developer portfolio NPAs of $155 million declined $52 million from the
third quarter, of which $53 million were commercial construction assets,
$88 million were commercial mortgage assets and $14 million were C&I
assets. Commercial portfolio NPAs included $160 million of nonaccrual
troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), compared with $189 million last
quarter.
Consumer portfolio NPAs of $478 million, or 1.34 percent of consumer
loans, leases and OREO, increased $8 million from the third quarter.
Consumer portfolio NPLs were $379 million, or 1.06 percent of consumer
loans and leases, and decreased $4 million from last quarter. Of
consumer NPAs, $416 million were in residential real estate portfolios.
Residential mortgage NPAs were $350 million, $13 million higher than
last quarter, with Florida representing 45 percent of residential
mortgage NPAs and 16 percent of total residential mortgage loans. Home
equity NPAs of $66 million were down $4 million compared with last
quarter. Credit card NPAs increased $2 million from the previous quarter
to $48 million. Other consumer NPAs were $1 million. Consumer nonaccrual
TDRs were $220 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, compared with $215
million in the third quarter.
Fourth quarter OREO balances included in portfolio NPA balances
described above were $364 million, down $25 million from $389 million in
the third quarter, and included $277 million in commercial OREO and $87
million in consumer OREO. Repossessed personal property of $14 million
consisted largely of autos.
Loans still accruing over 90 days past due were $200 million, down $74
million, or 27 percent, from the third quarter of 2011. Commercial
balances 90 days past due of $8 million decreased $55 million
sequentially. Consumer balances 90 days past due of $192 million were
down $19 million from the previous quarter. Loans 30-89 days past due of
$452 million decreased $22 million, or 5 percent, from the previous
quarter. Commercial balances 30-89 days past due of $98 million were
down $37 million sequentially and consumer balances 30-89 days past due
of $354 million increased $15 million from the third quarter.
At year-end, we held $138 million of commercial nonaccrual loans for
sale, compared with $197 million at the end of the third quarter. During
the quarter we sold approximately $31 million of non-accrual
held-for-sale loans; we transferred approximately $3 million of
non-accrual commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held-for-sale,
and we transferred approximately $5 million of loans from loans
held-for-sale to OREO. We recorded negative valuation adjustments of $18
million on held-for-sale loans and we recorded net gains of $8 million
on loans that were sold or settled during the quarter.
Capital Position
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
September
|
|
June
|
|
March
|
|
December
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Capital Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders' equity to average assets
|
|
11.41
|
%
|
|
11.33
|
%
|
|
11.12
|
%
|
|
11.77
|
%
|
|
12.52
|
%
|
|
|
Tangible equity (a)
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
|
8.98
|
%
|
|
9.01
|
%
|
|
8.76
|
%
|
|
10.42
|
%
|
|
|
Tangible common equity (excluding unrealized gains/losses) (a)
|
|
8.68
|
%
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
|
8.64
|
%
|
|
8.39
|
%
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
Tangible common equity (including unrealized gains/losses) (a)
|
|
9.04
|
%
|
|
9.04
|
%
|
|
8.96
|
%
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
7.30
|
%
|
|
|
Tangible common equity as a percent of risk-weighted assets
(excluding unrealized gains/losses) (a) (b)
|
|
9.41
|
%
|
|
9.39
|
%
|
|
9.28
|
%
|
|
9.09
|
%
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
|
|
Regulatory capital ratios: (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
|
|
11.91
|
%
|
|
11.96
|
%
|
|
11.93
|
%
|
|
12.20
|
%
|
|
13.89
|
%
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
16.08
|
%
|
|
16.25
|
%
|
|
16.03
|
%
|
|
16.27
|
%
|
|
18.08
|
%
|
|
|
Tier I leverage
|
|
11.10
|
%
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
11.03
|
%
|
|
11.21
|
%
|
|
12.79
|
%
|
|
|
Tier I common equity (a)
|
|
9.34
|
%
|
|
9.33
|
%
|
|
9.20
|
%
|
|
8.99
|
%
|
|
7.48
|
%
|
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
13.92
|
|
|
13.73
|
|
|
13.23
|
|
|
12.80
|
|
|
13.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible book value per share (a)
|
|
11.25
|
|
|
11.05
|
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The tangible equity, tangible common equity, tier I common
equity and tangible book value per share ratios, while not required
by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP), are considered to be critical metrics with
which to analyze banks. The ratios have been included herein to
facilitate a greater understanding of the Bancorp's capital
structure and financial condition. See the Regulation G Non-GAAP
Reconciliation table for a reconciliation of these ratios to U.S.
GAAP.
|
|
|
(b) Under the banking agencies risk-based capital guidelines, assets
and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet
exposures are assigned to broad risk categories. The aggregate
dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated
risk weight of the category. The resulting weighted values are added
together resulting in the Bancorp's total risk weighted assets.
|
|
|
(c) Current period regulatory capital data ratios are estimated.
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios remained strong during the quarter and reflected the
effect of growth in retained earnings as well as in assets. Compared
with the prior quarter, the Tier 1 common equity ratio* increased 1 bp
to 9.34 percent. The tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio*
was 8.68 percent (excluding unrealized gains/losses) and 9.04 percent
(including unrealized gains/losses). The Tier 1 capital ratio decreased
5 bps to 11.91 percent and the Total capital ratio decreased 17 bps to
16.08 percent; and the Leverage ratio increased 2 bps to 11.10 percent.
In addition to the effect of retained earnings and asset growth, the
Tier 1, Total, and Leverage capital ratios also reflected the redemption
of $25 million in TruPS during the quarter;
Book value per share at December 31, 2011 was $13.92 and tangible book
value per share* was $11.25, compared with September 30, 2011 book value
per share of $13.73 and tangible book value per share* of $11.05.
The Basel Committee has proposed new capital rules for Internationally
Active banks, known as “Basel III.” Fifth Third is subject to U.S. bank
regulations for capital, which have not yet been issued in response to
the Basel proposals. Fifth Third’s capital levels exceed current U.S.
“well-capitalized” standards and proposed Basel III capital standards,
and we expect Fifth Third’s capital levels to continue to exceed U.S.
“well-capitalized” standards including the adoption of U.S. rules that
incorporate changes contemplated under Basel III and/or the Dodd-Frank
Act.
Fifth Third’s Tier 1 and Total capital levels at December 31, 2011
included $2.2 billion of TruPS, or 2.1 percent of risk weighted assets.
During the quarter, the Bancorp redeemed at par $25 million of its
TruPS. Under the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation, these TruPS
are intended to be phased out of Tier 1 capital over three years
beginning in 2013. The Basel Committee also issued proposals that would
include a phase-out of these securities, although over a longer period.
We will continue to evaluate the role of these types of securities in
our capital structure, based on regulatory developments. To the extent
these types of securities remain outstanding during and after the
phase-in period, they would be expected to continue to be included in
Total capital, subject to prevailing U.S. capital standards. The Basel
Committee has also proposed adjustments to definitions of capital,
including what is to be included in the definition of Tier 1 common, and
to risk weightings applied to certain types of assets. We do not
currently expect these proposed adjustments, if adopted into U.S.
banking regulations, to negatively affect Fifth Third’s Tier 1 common
capital levels and for any potentially positive effect to be modest.
Fifth Third is one of 31 large U.S. Bank Holding Companies (BHCs)
subject to the Federal Reserve’s (FRB) Capital Plans Rule which was
issued November 22, 2011. Under this rule, we are required to submit our
annual capital plan to the Federal Reserve, for its objection or
non-objection. Fifth Third submitted its capital plan on January 9,
2012, as required. The submitted plans included an evaluation of results
under four required macroeconomic scenarios: a baseline and stress
scenario determined by the firms, and a baseline and stress scenario
provided by the Federal Reserve. As required, the plan also included
those capital actions Fifth Third intends to pursue or contemplate
during the period covered by the FRB’s response, which is 2012 and the
first quarter of 2013. Our plan for the covered period included the
possibility that we would increase our common dividend and would
initiate common share repurchases, although any such actions would be
based on the FRB’s non-objection, environmental conditions, earnings
results, our capital position, and other factors, as well as approval by
the Fifth Third Board of Directors, at the time. The Federal Reserve has
indicated to the BHCs that it will issue its response on or before March
15, 2012. We expect to manage our capital structure over time –
including the components represented by common equity and non-common
equity – to adapt to and reflect the effect of legislation, changes in
U.S. bank capital regulations that reflect international capital rules
developments, regulatory expectations, and our goals for capital levels
and capital composition as appropriate given any changes in rules.
Other
Fifth Third Bank owns a 49 percent interest in Vantiv, LLC, formerly
Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC. (Advent International owns the
remaining 51 percent interest.) The 49 percent interest is recorded on
Fifth Third’s balance sheet as an equity method investment with a book
value of $576 million. Additionally, Fifth Third has a warrant to
purchase additional shares in Vantiv which is carried as a derivative
asset at a fair market value of $111 million, and Advent has a
contingent put option to sell shares in Vantiv to Fifth Third which is
carried as a derivative liability at a fair market value of $1 million.
Conference Call
Fifth Third will host a conference call to discuss these financial
results at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) today. This conference call will be
webcast live by Thomson Financial and may be accessed through the Fifth
Third Investor Relations website at www.53.com
(click on “About Fifth Third” then “Investor Relations”). The webcast
also is being distributed over Thomson Financial’s Investor Distribution
Network to both institutional and individual investors. Individual
investors can listen to the call through Thomson Financial’s individual
investor center at www.earnings.com
or by visiting any of the investor sites in Thomson Financial’s
Individual Investor Network. Institutional investors can access the call
via Thomson Financial’s password-protected event management site,
StreetEvents (www.streetevents.com).
Those unable to listen to the live webcast may access a webcast replay
or podcast through the Fifth Third Investor Relations website at the
same web address. Additionally, a telephone replay of the conference
call will be available beginning approximately two hours after the
conference call until Friday, February 3rd by dialing
800-585-8367 for domestic access and 404-537-3406 for international
access (passcode 32053529#).
Corporate Profile
Fifth Third Bancorp is a diversified financial services company
headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. As of December 31, 2011, the Company
had $117 billion in assets and operated 15 affiliates with 1,316
full-service Banking Centers, including 104 Bank Mart® locations open
seven days a week inside select grocery stores and 2,425 ATMs in Ohio,
Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, West
Virginia, Pennsylvania, Missouri, Georgia and North Carolina. Fifth
Third operates four main businesses: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking,
Consumer Lending, and Investment Advisors. Fifth Third also has a 49%
interest in Vantiv, LLC, formerly Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC.
Fifth Third is among the largest money managers in the Midwest and, as
of December 31, 2011, had $282 billion in assets under care, of which it
managed $24 billion for individuals, corporations and not-for-profit
organizations. Investor
information and press
releases can be viewed at www.53.com.
Fifth Third’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ® National Global
Select Market under the symbol “FITB.”
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains statements that we believe are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder. These statements relate to our
financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future
performance or business. They usually can be identified by the use of
forward-looking language such as “will likely result,” “may,” “are
expected to,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “projected,”
“intends to,” or may include other similar words or phrases such as
“believes,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” or
similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,”
“would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” or similar verbs. You should
not place undue reliance on these statements, as they are subject to
risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors
set forth in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. When
considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind
these risks and uncertainties, as well as any cautionary statements we
may make. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only
as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually
known to us.
There are a number of important factors that could cause future
results to differ materially from historical performance and these
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference
include, but are not limited to: (1) general economic conditions and
weakening in the economy, specifically the real estate market, either
nationally or in the states in which Fifth Third, one or more acquired
entities and/or the combined company do business, are less favorable
than expected; (2) deteriorating credit quality; (3) political
developments, wars or other hostilities may disrupt or increase
volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions;
(4) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins;
(5) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs
and loan loss provisions; (6) Fifth Third’s ability to maintain required
capital levels and adequate sources of funding and liquidity;
(7) maintaining capital requirements may limit Fifth Third’s operations
and potential growth; (8) changes and trends in capital markets;
(9) problems encountered by larger or similar financial institutions may
adversely affect the banking industry and/or Fifth Third;
(10) competitive pressures among depository institutions increase
significantly; (11) effects of critical accounting policies and
judgments; (12) changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be
required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other
regulatory agencies; (13) legislative or regulatory changes or actions,
or significant litigation, adversely affect Fifth Third, one or more
acquired entities and/or the combined company or the businesses in which
Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company
are engaged, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act; (14) ability to maintain favorable ratings from rating
agencies; (15) fluctuation of Fifth Third’s stock price; (16) ability to
attract and retain key personnel; (17) ability to receive dividends from
its subsidiaries; (18) potentially dilutive effect of future
acquisitions on current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third;
(19) effects of accounting or financial results of one or more acquired
entities; (20) difficulties in separating Vantiv, LLC, formerly Fifth
Third Processing Solutions from Fifth Third; (21) loss of income from
any sale or potential sale of businesses that could have an adverse
effect on Fifth Third’s earnings and future growth; (22) ability to
secure confidential information through the use of computer systems and
telecommunications networks; and (23) the impact of reputational risk
created by these developments on such matters as business generation and
retention, funding and liquidity.
You should refer to our periodic and current reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC,” for further information on
other factors, which could cause actual results to be significantly
different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements.
* Non-GAAP measure; See Reg. G reconciliation on page 33 in Exhibit
99.1 of 8-k filing dated 1/20/12

Source: Fifth Third Bancorp
Fifth Third Bancorp
Jim Eglseder (Investors), 513-534-8424
or
Rich
Rosen, CFA (Investors), 513-534-3307
or
Debra DeCourcy, APR
(Media), 513-534-4153