Press Releases | | Harry Winston Diamond Corporation delivers strong growth in both segments of its diamond business as increased global consumer demand for jewelry and timepieces drives both sales and rough diamond prices | TORONTO, Sept. 7, 2011 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Harry Winston Diamond Corporation (TSX:
HW) (NYSE:HWD) (the "Company") today announced its second quarter
Fiscal 2012 results for the quarter ending July 31, 2011.
Robert Gannicott, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer said, "Global retail demand, especially in the emerging economies such as China
and India, has delivered both strong retail sales growth and strong
rough diamond prices. Seeing through the effect of a small number of
high-value, lower margin sales, our own jewelry and timepiece business
shows solid growth in both sales and margin in the core bridal,
timepiece and designed jewelry segments. The market price increase in
rough diamonds has more than compensated for two complete sales versus
three in the comparable prior year quarter as well as the lower quality
diamonds mined from the upper part of the current open pit.
Looking forward we continue to see strong global jewelry and timepiece
demand from China while Japan and the Middle East improve and the US
remains subdued. On this basis we expect to continue to grow our own
jewelry and timepiece business despite challenging economic conditions
in the US and Europe. Although we do not predict further near-term
rough diamond market price increases we do see our own rough diamond
sales price already improving as we produce more from the higher valued
A-154 South and North pipes."
Second Quarter Highlights:
-
For the mining segment, a total of 0.72 million carats were produced, an
increase of 11% over the prior year. Due to a sale date straddling the
quarter end, a total of 0.57 million carats were sold in this quarter
versus 0.78 million carats sold in the second quarter of the prior
year. The carats sold were smaller than the prior year due to extra
small diamonds from the processing of earlier plant rejects and lower
quality ore from the upper section of the A-418 pipe. Despite these
cumulative negative variances the market price increase of 41% led to
an increase of 3% in sales.
-
For the luxury brand segment, sales were $132.8 million, an increase of
98% versus the prior year (81% at constant exchange rates). Seeing
through the effect of $55.6 million of very large transactions at a
reduced margin, solid growth in both sales and margin were delivered by
the jewelry and timepiece businesses. This segment generated operating
profit of $6.8 million and EBITDA of $10.1 million during the second
quarter.
Fiscal 2012 Second Quarter Financial Summary
(US$ in millions except Earnings per Share amounts) (Prepared in
accordance with IFRS)
|
Three months
ended
July 31, 2011
|
Three months
ended
July 31, 2010
|
Six months
ended
July 31, 2011
|
Six months
ended
July 31, 2010
|
Sales -Mining Segment -Luxury Brand Segment |
$222.4 89.6 132.8 |
$153.7 86.8 66.9 |
$366.3 151.6 214.7 |
$267.7 135.7 132.0 |
Operating profit -Mining Segment -Luxury Brand Segment |
23.1 16.3 6.8 |
29.9 27.6 2.3 |
27.8 16.9 10.9 |
32.3 28.5 3.8 |
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders
|
10.0
|
13.0
|
13.6
|
15.2
|
|
Earnings per share
|
$0.12
|
$0.17
|
$0.16
|
$0.20
|
Complete financial statements, MD&A and a discussion of risk factors are
included in the accompanying release.
Conference Call and Webcast
Beginning at 8:30AM (Eastern Time) on Thursday, September 8, 2011, the
Company will host a conference call for analysts, investors and other
interested parties. Listeners may access a live broadcast of the
conference call on the Company's investor relations web site at http://investor.harrywinston.com or by dialing 866-831-6270 within North America or 617-213-8858 from
international locations and entering passcode 34099286.
An online archive of the broadcast will be available by accessing the
Company's investor relations web site at http://investor.harrywinston.com. A telephone replay of the call will be available one hour after the
call through 11:00PM (ET), Thursday, September 22, 2011 by dialing
888-286-8010 within North America or 617-801-6888 from international
locations and entering passcode 69493950.
About Harry Winston Diamond Corporation Harry Winston Diamond Corporation is a diamond enterprise with premium
assets in the mining and retail segments of the diamond industry. Harry
Winston supplies rough diamonds to the global market from its 40
percent ownership interest in the Diavik Diamond Mine. The Company's
luxury brand segment is a premier diamond jeweler and luxury timepiece
retailer with salons in key locations, including New York, Paris,
London, Beijing, Tokyo, Hong Kong and Beverly Hills.
The Company focuses on the two most profitable segments of the diamond
industry, mining and retail, in which its expertise creates shareholder
value. This unique business model provides key competitive advantages;
rough diamond sales and polished diamond purchases provide market
intelligence that enhances the Company's overall performance.
For more information, please visit www.harrywinston.com or for investor information, visit http://investor.harrywinston.com.
Highlights
(ALL FIGURES ARE IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Consolidated sales were $222.4 million for the second quarter compared
to $153.7 million for the comparable quarter of the prior year,
resulting in a 6% increase in gross margin to $72.2 million and an
operating profit of $23.1 million, compared to an operating profit of
$29.9 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year. Consolidated
EBITDA was $43.8 million compared to $49.4 million in the comparable
quarter of the prior year.
The mining segment recorded sales of $89.6 million, a 3% increase from
$86.8 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year. The increase
in sales resulted primarily from a 41% increase in achieved rough
diamond prices during the quarter, offset by a 27% decrease in volume
of carats sold. The mining segment recorded operating profit of $16.3
million compared to $27.6 million in the comparable quarter of the
prior year. EBITDA for the mining segment was $33.7 million compared to
$44.0 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
The luxury brand segment recorded sales of $132.8 million, an increase
of 98% from sales of $66.9 million in the comparable quarter of the
prior year (81% at constant exchange rates). Included in the second
quarter were $55.6 million of high-value transactions, which generally
carry lower-than-average gross margins. Operating profit was $6.8
million for the quarter compared to $2.3 million in the same quarter of
the prior year. EBITDA for the luxury brand segment was $10.1 million
compared to $5.5 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
The Company recorded a consolidated net profit attributable to
shareholders of $10.0 million or $0.12 per share for the quarter,
compared to a net profit attributable to shareholders of $13.0 million
or $0.17 per share in the second quarter of the prior year.
Management's Discussion and Analysis
PREPARED AS OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 (ALL FIGURES ARE IN UNITED STATES
DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
The following is management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A") of the
results of operations for HarryWinston Diamond Corporation
("HarryWinston Diamond Corporation", or the "Company") for the three
and six months ended July 31, 2011, andits financial position as at
July 31, 2011. This MD&A is based on the Company's unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and should be read
in conjunction with the unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the three and six months
ended July 31, 2011 and for the three months ended April 30, 2011, and
the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes
thereto for the year ended January 31, 2011 (prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in Canada ("Canadian
GAAP" or "CDN GAAP")). Unless otherwise specified, all financial
information is presented in United States dollars. Unless otherwise
indicated, all references to "second quarter" refer to the three months
ended July 31. Unless otherwise indicated, references to
"international" for the luxury brand segment refer to Europe and Asia.
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the
current year's presentation.
Certain information included in this MD&A may constitute forward-looking
information within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities
laws. In some cases, forward-looking information can be identified by
the use of terms such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "plan",
"anticipate", "foresee", "appears", "believe", "intend", "estimate",
"predict", "potential", "continue", "objective", "modeled" or other
similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts.
Forward-looking information may relate to management's future outlook
and anticipated events or results, and may include statements or
information regarding plans, timelines and targets for construction,
mining, development, production and exploration activities at the
Diavik Diamond Mine, future mining and processing at the Diavik Diamond
Mine, projected capital expenditure requirements and the funding
thereof, liquidity and working capital requirements and sources,
estimated reserves and resources at, and production from, the Diavik
Diamond Mine, the number and timing of expected rough diamond sales,
the demand for rough diamonds, expected diamond prices and expectations
concerning the diamond industry and the demand for luxury goods,
expected cost of sales and gross margin trends in the mining segment,
targets for compound annual growth rates of sales and operating income
in the luxury brand segment, plans for expansion of the retail salon
network, and expected sales trends and market conditions in the luxury
brand segment. Actual results may vary from the forward-looking
information. See "Risks and Uncertainties" on page 17 for material risk
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is based on certain factors and assumptions
regarding, among other things, mining, production, construction and
exploration activities at the Diavik Diamond Mine, world and US
economic conditions and the worldwide demand for luxury goods.
Specifically, in making statements regarding expected diamond prices
and expectations concerning the diamond industry and expected sales
trends and market conditions in the luxury brand segment, the Company
has made assumptions regarding, among other things, the state of world
and US economic conditions, worldwide diamond production levels, and
demand for luxury goods. While the Company considers these assumptions
to be reasonable based on the information currently available to it,
they may prove to be incorrect. See "Risks and Uncertainties" on page
17.
Forward-looking information is subject to certain factors, including
risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from what we currently expect. These factors include, among
other things, the uncertain nature of mining activities, including
risks associated with underground construction and mining operations,
risks associated with joint venture operations, risks associated with
the remote location of and harsh climate at the Diavik Diamond Mine
site, risks associated with regulatory requirements, fluctuations in
diamond prices and changes in US and world economic conditions, the
risk of fluctuations in the Canadian/US dollar exchange rate, cash flow
and liquidity risks, the risks of competition in the luxury jewelry
business as well as changes in demand for high-end luxury goods. Please
see page 17 of this Interim Report, as well as the Company's current
Annual Information Form, available at www.sedar.com, for a discussion
of these and other risks and uncertainties involved in the Company's
operations.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue importance on forward-looking
information, which speaks only as of the date of this MD&A, and should
not rely upon this information as of any other date. Due to
assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including the assumptions, risks
and uncertainties identified above and elsewhere in this MD&A, actual
events may differ materially from current expectations. The Company
uses forward-looking statements because it believes such statements
provide useful information with respect to the expected future
operations and financial performance of the Company, and cautions
readers that the information may not be appropriate for other purposes.
While the Company may elect to, it is under no obligation and does not
undertake to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise at any
particular time, except as required by law. Additional information
concerning factors that may cause actual results to materially differ
from those in such forward-looking statements is contained in the
Company's filings with Canadian and United States securities regulatory
authorities and can be found at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.
Summary Discussion
Harry Winston Diamond Corporation is a diamond enterprise with premium
assets in the mining and retailing segments of the diamond industry.
The Company supplies rough diamonds to the global market from its 40%
ownership interest in the Diavik Diamond Mine, located in Canada'sNorthwest Territories. The Company's luxury brand segment is a premier
diamond jeweler and luxury timepiece retailer with salons in key
locations including New York, Paris, London, Beijing, Tokyo, Hong Kong
and Beverly Hills.
The Company's mining asset is an ownership interest in the Diavik group
of mineral claims. The Diavik Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") is an
unincorporated joint arrangement between Diavik Diamond Mines Inc.
("DDMI") (60%) and HarryWinston Diamond Limited Partnership ("HWDLP")
(40%) where HWDLP holds an undivided 40% ownership interest in the
assets, liabilities and expenses of the Diavik Diamond Mine. DDMI is
the operator of the Diavik Diamond Mine. DDMI and HWDLP are
headquartered in Yellowknife, Canada. DDMI is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Rio Tinto plc of London, England.
Market Commentary
The Diamond Market
The market continued to pushthe price of rough diamonds to new highs in
the second quarter of fiscal 2012, exceeding the record highs achieved
in the first quarter. The market price per carat for rough diamonds
increased approximately 50% over the comparable quarter of the prior
year. The driving markets remained the Far East and India. In addition,
US market demand remained steady as the retail sector restocked for the
2011 holiday season. Towards the end of the second quarter, the market
experienced resistance to further diamond price increases, which may
persist until confidence returns to the global market.
The Luxury Jewelry & Timepiece Market
Overall, the luxury jewelry and timepiece market experienced another
solid quarter with positive increases in sales and profits compared
with the comparable period of the prior year. Demand for luxury
products around the world continues to increase, supported by the
rapidly rising wealth of clients in emerging markets. Despite increased
global economic uncertainty centered in the US and Europe, the Company
expects new consumers in emerging markets to continue to drive luxury
goods demand.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Results
The following is a summary of the Company's consolidated quarterly
results for the eight quarters ended July 31, 2011 following the basis
of presentation utilized in its IFRS and Canadian GAAP financial
statements:
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars except per share
amounts and where otherwise noted)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
222,378
|
|
$
|
143,932
|
|
$
|
215,358
|
|
$
|
140,877
|
|
$
|
153,728
|
|
$
|
114,000
|
|
$
|
133,654
|
|
$
|
74,828
|
|
$
|
366,310
|
|
$
|
267,728
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
150,177
|
|
|
96,452
|
|
|
141,391
|
|
|
84,765
|
|
|
85,798
|
|
|
75,711
|
|
|
96,257
|
|
|
45,227
|
|
|
246,629
|
|
|
161,509
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
72,201
|
|
|
47,480
|
|
|
73,967
|
|
|
56,112
|
|
|
67,930
|
|
|
38,289
|
|
|
37,397
|
|
|
29,601
|
|
|
119,681
|
|
|
106,219
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
|
|
32.5% |
|
|
33.0% |
|
|
34.3% |
|
|
39.8% |
|
|
44.2% |
|
|
33.6% |
|
|
28.0% |
|
|
39.6% |
|
|
32.7% |
|
|
39.7% |
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
49,101
|
|
|
42,795
|
|
|
52,722
|
|
|
41,282
|
|
|
37,998
|
|
|
35,948
|
|
|
40,479
|
|
|
34,542
|
|
|
91,896
|
|
|
73,946
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
4,685
|
|
|
21,245
|
|
|
14,830
|
|
|
29,932
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
(3,082)
|
|
|
(4,941)
|
|
|
27,785
|
|
|
32,273
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
(5,183)
|
|
|
(3,983)
|
|
|
(3,727)
|
|
|
(3,835)
|
|
|
(2,985)
|
|
|
(2,880)
|
|
|
(2,396)
|
|
|
(2,448)
|
|
|
(9,166)
|
|
|
(5,865)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
|
|
(781)
|
|
|
(212)
|
|
|
(351)
|
|
|
(212)
|
|
|
(76)
|
|
|
(27)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(993)
|
|
|
(103)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
322
|
|
Insurance settlement
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
(177)
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
(2,213)
|
|
|
(1,978)
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
(1,170)
|
|
Profit (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
17,507
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
18,837
|
|
|
10,987
|
|
|
28,068
|
|
|
(2,611)
|
|
|
(7,327)
|
|
|
(5,592)
|
|
|
18,078
|
|
|
25,457
|
|
Income tax expense (recovery)
|
|
|
|
7,519
|
|
|
(3,027)
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
(2,410)
|
|
|
10,877
|
|
|
(5,524)
|
|
|
(5,800)
|
|
|
(4,221)
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
Net profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
9,988
|
|
$
|
3,598
|
|
$
|
13,576
|
|
$
|
13,397
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
$
|
2,913
|
|
$
|
(1,527)
|
|
$
|
(1,371)
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
Attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
$
|
9,986
|
|
$
|
3,596
|
|
$
|
13,569
|
|
$
|
12,657
|
|
$
|
13,043
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
$
|
(3,358)
|
|
$
|
(214)
|
|
$
|
13,582
|
|
$
|
15,180
|
|
Attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
4,148
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
(1,157)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4,924
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
$
|
(0.04)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
$
|
(0.04)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Total assets (i) |
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
$
|
1,606
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
$
|
1,495
|
|
$
|
1,535
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
Total long-term liabilities (i) |
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23,100
|
|
$
|
4,685
|
|
$
|
21,245
|
|
$
|
14,830
|
|
$
|
29,932
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
$
|
(3,082)
|
|
$
|
(4,941)
|
|
$
|
27,785
|
|
$
|
32,273
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (ii) |
|
|
|
20,716
|
|
|
20,291
|
|
|
24,635
|
|
|
18,657
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
11,208
|
|
|
41,007
|
|
|
33,715
|
|
EBITDA (iii) |
|
|
$
|
43,816
|
|
$
|
24,976
|
|
$
|
45,880
|
|
$
|
33,487
|
|
$
|
49,447
|
|
$
|
16,541
|
|
$
|
15,176
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
$
|
68,792
|
|
$
|
65,988
|
|
(i)
|
Total assets and total long-term liabilities are expressed in millions
of United States dollars.
|
|
(ii)
|
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses.
|
|
(iii)
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"). See "Non-GAAP Measure" on page 16.
|
|
The comparability of quarter-over-quarter results is impacted by
seasonality for both the mining and luxury brand segments. Harry
Winston Diamond Corporation expects that the quarterly results for its
mining segment will continue to fluctuate depending on the seasonality
of production at the Diavik Diamond Mine, the number of sales events
conducted during the quarter, and the volume, size and quality
distribution of rough diamonds delivered from the Diavik Diamond Mine
in each quarter. The quarterly results for the luxury brand segment are
also seasonal, with generally higher sales during the fourth quarter
due to the holiday season. See "Segmented Analysis" on page 9 for
additional information.
|
Three Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoThree Months Ended July 31,
2010
CONSOLIDATED NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Company recorded a second quarter consolidated net profit
attributable to shareholders of $10.0 million or $0.12 per share
compared to a net profit attributable to shareholders of $13.0million
or $0.17 per share in the second quarter of the prior year.
CONSOLIDATED SALES
Sales for the second quarter totalled $222.4 million, consisting of
rough diamond sales of $89.6 million and luxury brand segmentsales of
$132.8 million. This compares to sales of $153.7 million in the
comparable quarter of theprior year (rough diamond sales of
$86.8million and luxury brand segment sales of $66.9 million).
See"Segmented Analysis" on page 9 for additional information.
CONSOLIDATED COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
The Company's second quarter cost of sales was $150.2 million for a
gross margin of 32.5% compared toa cost of sales of $85.8 million and
a gross margin of 44.2% for the comparable quarter of the prior year.
The Company's cost of sales includes costs associated with mining,
rough diamond sorting and luxury brand sales activities. See "Segmented
Analysis" on page9 for additional information.
CONSOLIDATED SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
The principal components of selling, general and administrative ("SG&A")
expenses include expenses for salaries and benefits, advertising and
marketing, rent and building related costs. The Company incurred SG&A
expenses of $49.1 million for the second quarter, compared to
$38.0million in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
Included in SG&A expenses for the second quarter was $5.7 million for
the mining segment compared to $4.8 million for the comparable quarter
of the prior year and $43.4 million for the luxury brand segment
compared to $33.2 million for the comparable quarter of the prior year.
See"Segmented Analysis" on page 9 for additional information.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAXES
The Company recorded a net income tax expense of $7.5 million during the
second quarter, compared to a net income tax expense of $10.9 million
in the comparable quarter of the prior year. The Company's combined
Canadian federal and provincial statutory tax rate for the quarter is
27.9%. There are a number of items that can significantly impact the
Company's effective tax rate, including foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, the Northwest Territories mining royalty, earnings
subject to tax different than the statutory rate such as earnings in
foreign jurisdictions, and changes in valuation allowances. As a
result, the Company's recorded tax provision can be significantly
different than the expected tax provision calculated based on the
statutory tax rate.
The recorded tax provision is particularly impacted by foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations. The Company's functional and reporting
currency is US dollars; however, the calculation of income tax expense
is based on income in the currency of the country of origin. As such,
the Company is continually subject to foreign exchange fluctuations,
particularly as the Canadian dollar moves against the US dollar. During
the second quarter, the Canadian dollar weakened against the US dollar.
As a result, the Company recorded an unrealized foreign exchange gain
of $1.9 million on the revaluation of the Company's Canadian dollar
denominated deferred income tax liability. This compares to an
unrealized foreign exchange gain of $1.8 million in the comparable
quarter of the prior year. The unrealized foreign exchange gain is
recorded as part of the Company's deferred income tax recovery, and is
not taxable for Canadian income tax purposes.During the second
quarter, the Company also recognized a deferred income tax expense of
$4.0 million for temporary differences arising from the difference
between the historical exchange rate and the current exchange rate
translation of foreign currency non-monetary items. This compares to a
deferred income tax expense of $3.4 million recognized in the
comparable quarter of the prior year. The recorded tax provision
during the second quarter also included a net income tax recovery of
$1.2 million relating to foreign exchange differences between income in
the currency of the country of origin and the US dollar. This compares
to a net income tax recovery of $0.2 million recognized in the
comparable period of the prior year.
The rate of income tax payable by Harry Winston Inc. varies by
jurisdiction. Net operating losses are available in certain
jurisdictions to offset future income taxes payable in such
jurisdictions. The net operating losses are scheduled to expire through
2031.
Due to the number of factors that can potentially impact the effective
tax rate and the sensitivity of the tax provision to these factors, as
discussed above, it is expected that the Company's effective tax rate
will fluctuate in future periods.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCE EXPENSES
Finance expenses of $5.2 million were incurred during the second quarter
compared to $3.0 million during the comparable quarter of the prior
year. Finance expenses were impacted by increased debt levels in the
mining segment relating to the drawdown of $50.0 million on the
Standard Chartered Bank credit facility on July 31, 2010 and the $70.0
million promissory note payable to Kinross Gold Corporation ("Kinross")
issued on August 25, 2010.
CONSOLIDATED EXPLORATION EXPENSE
Exploration expense of $0.8 million was incurred during the second
quarter compared to $0.1 million in the comparable quarter of the prior
year.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCE AND OTHER INCOME
Finance and other income of $0.1 million was recorded during the quarter
compared to $0.2 million in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
CONSOLIDATED FOREIGN EXCHANGE
A net foreign exchange gain of $0.3 million was recognized during the
quarter compared to a net foreign exchange gain of $1.0 million in the
comparable quarter of the prior year. TheCompany does not currently
have any significant foreign exchange derivative instruments
outstanding.
Six Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoSix Months Ended July 31,
2010
CONSOLIDATED NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Company recorded consolidated net profit attributable to
shareholders of $13.6 million or $0.16 per share for the six months
ended July 31, 2011, compared to a net profit attributable to
shareholders of $15.2million or $0.20 per share in the comparable
period of the prior year.
CONSOLIDATED SALES
Sales for the six months ended July 31, 2011, totalled $366.3 million,
consisting of rough diamond sales of $151.6 million and luxury brand
segmentsales of $214.7 million. This compares to sales of $267.7
million in the comparable period of theprior year (rough diamond sales
of $135.7million and luxury brand segment sales of $132.0million).
See"Segmented Analysis" on page 9 for additional information.
CONSOLIDATED COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
The Company's cost of sales for the six months ended July 31, 2011, was
$246.6 million for a gross margin of 32.7% compared toa cost of sales
of $161.5 million and a gross margin of 39.7% in the comparable period
of the prior year. The Company's cost of sales includes costs
associated with mining, rough diamond sorting and luxury brand sales
activities. See "Segmented Analysis" on page9 for additional
information.
CONSOLIDATED SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
The principal components of SG&A expenses include expenses for salaries
and benefits, advertising and marketing, rent and building related
costs. The Company incurred SG&A expenses of $91.9 million for the six
months ended July 31, 2011, compared to $73.9million in the comparable
period of the prior year.
Included in SG&A expenses for the six months ended July 31, 2011, was
$13.7 million for the mining segment compared to $8.7 million for the
comparable period of the prior year and $78.2 million for the luxury
brand segment compared to $65.2 million for the comparable period of
the prior year. See"Segmented Analysis" on page 9 for additional
information.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAXES
The Company recorded a net income tax expense of $4.5 million during the
six months ended July 31, 2011, compared to a net income tax expense of
$5.4 million in the comparable period of the prior year. The Company's
combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory tax rate for the
quarter is 27.9%. There are a number of items that can significantly
impact the Company's effective tax rate, including foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations, the Northwest Territories mining royalty,
earnings subject to tax different than the statutory rate such as
earnings in foreign jurisdictions, and changes in valuation
allowances. As a result, the Company's recorded tax provision can be
significantly different than the expected tax provision calculated
based on the statutory tax rate.
The recorded tax provision is particularly impacted by foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations. The Company's functional and reporting
currency is US dollars; however, the calculation of income tax expense
is based on income in the currency of the country of origin. As such,
the Company is continually subject to foreign exchange fluctuations,
particularly as the Canadian dollar moves against the US dollar. During
the six months ended July 31, 2011, the Canadian dollar strengthened
against the US dollar. As a result, the Company recorded an unrealized
foreign exchange loss of $9.8 million on the revaluation of the
Company's Canadian dollar denominated deferred income tax liability.
This compares to an unrealized foreign exchange loss of $6.2 million in
the comparable period of the prior year. The unrealized foreign
exchange loss is recorded as part of the Company's deferred income tax
recovery, and is not deductible for Canadian income tax purposes.
During the six months ended July 31, 2011, the Company also recognized
a deferred income tax recovery of $8.6 million for temporary
differences arising from the difference between the historical exchange
rate and the current exchange rate translation of foreign currency
non-monetary items. This compares to a deferred income tax recovery of
$6.6 million recognized in the comparable period of the prior year.
The recorded tax provision during the six months ended July 31, 2011
also included a net income tax recovery of $3.2 million relating to
foreign exchange differences between income in the currency of the
country of origin and the US dollar. This compares to a net income tax
recovery of $1.8 million recognized in the comparable period of the
prior year.
The rate of income tax payable by Harry Winston Inc. varies by
jurisdiction. Net operating losses are available in certain
jurisdictions to offset future income taxes payable in such
jurisdictions. The net operating losses are scheduled to expire through
2031.
Due to the number of factors that can potentially impact the effective
tax rate and the sensitivity of the tax provision to these factors, as
discussed above, it is expected that the Company's effective tax rate
will fluctuate in future periods.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCE EXPENSES
Finance expenses of $9.2 million were incurred during the six months
ended July 31, 2011, compared to $5.9 million during the comparable
period of the prior year. Finance expenses were impacted by increased
debt levels in the mining segment relating to the drawdown of $50.0
million on the Standard Chartered Bank credit facility on July 31, 2010
and the $70.0 million promissory note payable to Kinross issued on
August 25, 2010.
CONSOLIDATED EXPLORATION EXPENSE
Exploration expense of $1.0 million was incurred during the six months
ended July 31, 2011, compared to $0.1 million in the comparable period
of the prior year.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCE AND OTHER INCOME
Finance and other income of $0.3 million was recorded during the six
months ended July 31, 2011, consistent with the comparable period of
the prior year.
CONSOLIDATED FOREIGN EXCHANGE
A net foreign exchange gain of $0.1 million was recognized during the
six months ended July 31, 2011, compared to a net foreign exchange loss
of $1.2 million in the comparable period of the prior year. TheCompany
does not currently have any significant foreign exchange derivative
instruments outstanding.
Segmented Analysis
The operating segments of the Company include mining and luxury brand
segments.
Mining
The mining segment includes the production and sale of rough diamonds.
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
89,608
|
|
$
|
62,035
|
|
$
|
82,697
|
|
$
|
60,708
|
|
$
|
86,827
|
|
$
|
48,922
|
|
$
|
63,489
|
|
$
|
20,765
|
|
$
|
151,643
|
|
$
|
135,749
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
67,613
|
|
|
53,443
|
|
|
61,822
|
|
|
45,039
|
|
|
54,408
|
|
|
44,143
|
|
|
57,027
|
|
|
20,319
|
|
|
121,056
|
|
|
98,551
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
21,995
|
|
|
8,592
|
|
|
20,875
|
|
|
15,669
|
|
|
32,419
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
|
6,462
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
30,587
|
|
|
37,198
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
|
|
24.5% |
|
|
13.9% |
|
|
25.2% |
|
|
25.8% |
|
|
37.3% |
|
|
9.8% |
|
|
10.2% |
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
20.2% |
|
|
27.4% |
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
8,026
|
|
|
4,828
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
13,735
|
|
|
8,683
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
$
|
16,047
|
|
$
|
9,438
|
|
$
|
27,606
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
$
|
(4,486)
|
|
$
|
16,852
|
|
$
|
28,515
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (i) |
|
|
|
17,461
|
|
|
17,083
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
15,428
|
|
|
16,352
|
|
|
10,975
|
|
|
14,976
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
34,544
|
|
|
27,327
|
|
EBITDA (ii) |
|
|
$
|
33,747
|
|
$
|
17,649
|
|
$
|
36,716
|
|
$
|
24,866
|
|
$
|
43,958
|
|
$
|
11,884
|
|
$
|
16,553
|
|
$
|
3,359
|
|
$
|
51,396
|
|
$
|
55,842
|
| (i) |
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses.
|
| (ii) |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"). See "Non-GAAP Measure" on page 16.
|
Three Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoThree Months Ended July 31,
2010
MINING SALES
During the quarter, the Company sold 0.57 million carats for a total of
$89.6 million for an average price per carat of $157 compared to
0.78million carats for a total of $86.8 million for an average price
per carat of $112 in the comparable quarter of the prior year.
TheCompany held two complete rough diamond sales in the second
quarter, compared to three complete sales in the comparable quarter of
the prior year. The 41% increase in the Company's achieved rough
diamond price per carat was impacted by a sales mix, dominated by
production from the lower value A-418 B ore.
On a quarterly basis, the Company expects that results for its mining
segment will continue to fluctuate depending on the seasonality of
production at the Diavik Diamond Mine, the number of sales events
conducted during the quarter, rough diamond prices and the volume, size
and quality distribution of rough diamonds delivered from the Diavik
Diamond Mine in eachquarter.
MINING COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
The Company's second quarter cost of sales was $67.6 million resulting
in a gross margin of 24.5% compared to a cost of sales of $54.4million
and a gross margin of 37.3% in the comparable quarter of the prior
year. Cost of sales included $16.8 million of depreciation and
amortization compared to $15.7 million in the comparable quarter of the
prior year. The increase in cost of sales was due primarily to a
greater volume of production during the quarter from the higher-cost
underground development mining. The mining gross margin is anticipated
to fluctuate between quarters, resulting from variations in the
specific mix of product sold during each quarter and rough diamond
prices.
A substantial portion of cost of sales is mining operating costs, which
are incurred at the Diavik Diamond Mine. Cost of sales also includes
sorting costs, which consist of the Company's cost of handling and
sorting product in preparation for sales to third parties, and
amortization and depreciation, the majority of which is recorded using
the unit-of-production method over estimated proven and probable
reserves.
MINING SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
SG&A expenses for the mining segment increased by $0.9 million from the
comparable quarter of the prior year due to a mark-to-market on
stock-based compensation and the strengthening of the Canadian dollar.
Six Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoSix Months Ended July 31,
2010
MINING SALES
During the six months ended July 31, 2011, the Company sold 1.0 million
carats for a total of $151.6 million for an average price per carat of
$146 compared to 1.2million carats for a total of $135.7 million for
an average price per carat of $109 in the comparable period of the
prior year. TheCompany held four complete rough diamond sales in the
six months ended July 31, 2011, compared to five complete sales in the
comparable period of the prior year. The 34% increase in the Company's
achieved rough diamond price per carat was impacted by a sales mix,
dominated by production from the lower value A-418 B ore.
The Company expects that results for its mining segment will continue to
fluctuate depending on the seasonality of production at the Diavik
Diamond Mine, the number of sales events conducted during the quarter,
rough diamond prices and the volume, size and quality distribution of
rough diamonds delivered from the Diavik Diamond Mine in eachquarter.
MINING COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
The Company's cost of sales for the six months ended July 31, 2011, was
$121.1 million resulting in a gross margin of 20.2% compared to a cost
of sales of $98.6million and a gross margin of 27.4% in the comparable
period of the prior year. Cost of sales included $33.2 million of
depreciation and amortization compared to $26.1 million in the
comparable period of the prior year. The increase in cost of sales was
due primarily to a higher volume of production during the period from
the higher-cost underground mine. The mining gross margin is
anticipated to fluctuate between quarters, resulting from variations in
the specific mix of product sold during each quarter and rough diamond
prices.
A substantial portion of cost of sales is mining operating costs, which
are incurred at the Diavik Diamond Mine. Cost of sales also includes
sorting costs, which consist of the Company's cost of handling and
sorting product in preparation for sales to third parties, and
amortization and depreciation, the majority of which is recorded using
the unit-of-production method over estimated proven and probable
reserves.
MINING SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
SG&A expenses for the mining segment increased by $5.1 million from the
comparable period of the prior year due to executive severance, a
mark-to-market on stock-based compensation and the strengthening of the
Canadian dollar during the period.
MINING SEGMENT OPERATIONAL UPDATE
Ore production for the second calendar quarter consisted of 1.47million
carats produced from 0.43 million tonnes of ore from the A-418
kimberlite pipe, 0.18million carats produced from 0.09 million tonnes
of ore from the A-154 North kimberlite pipe, and 0.09million carats
produced from 0.02million tonnes of ore from the A-154 South
kimberlite pipe. Also included in production for the calendar quarter
was an estimated 0.05 million carats from reprocessed plant rejects
("RPR"). These RPR are not included in the Company's reserves and
resource statement and are therefore incremental to production. Rough
diamond production was 11% higher than the comparable calendar quarter
of the prior year due primarily to the improvement in grade of the ore
from the A-418 open pit.
HARRY WINSTON DIAMOND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP'S 40% SHARE OF DIAVIK DIAMOND
MINE PRODUCTION
|
(reported on a one-month lag)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended
June 30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended
June 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months
ended
June 30,
2010
|
|
Diamonds recovered (000s carats)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
Grade (carats/tonne)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
Mining Segment Outlook
PRODUCTION
The approved mine plan and budget for calendar 2011 estimates Diavik
Diamond Mine production of approximately 6.9 million carats from the
mining of 2.0 million tonnes of ore and processing of 2.2 million
tonnes of ore, with the increment delivered from stockpile. It is
expected that with the accelerated production towards the end of the
year, carats shipped will be lower than carats produced in the calendar
year. This difference is expected to reverse in calendar 2012.
Production for the year is expected to comprise approximately 1.4
million tonnes from the A-418 open pit, and 0.6 million tonnes from the
underground portions of A-154 South and A-154 North. The Company
expects that in the second half of the year, the higher grade A-154
South will continue to be mined using sub-level retreat, the higher
velocity and lower cost mining method that commenced in July 2011.
Looking beyond calendar 2011, the objective is to fully utilize
processing capacity with a combination of underground and open pit
production. Current plans see A-21 development beginning in 2013, with
production in 2015. In addition, exploration work has identified
extensions at depth to the A-418 and A-154 North kimberlite pipes. The
inclusion of these extensions into ore reserves will be largely
dependent upon the costs of new underground mining techniques currently
under review. The Company is in the process of updating the
life-of-mine plan, which it expects to release publicly later this
year.
PRICING
The rough diamond market continued to improve into the second quarter of
fiscal 2012. Towards the end of the second quarter, the market
experienced resistance to further diamond price increases which may
persist until confidence returns to the global market. Based on Harry
Winston Diamond Corporation's rough diamond sales prices as of July
2011 and the current diamond recovery profile of the Diavik processing
plant, the Company has modeled the approximate rough diamond price per
carat for each of the Diavik ore types as follows:
|
Ore type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price
per carat
(in US dollars)
|
|
A-154 South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 200
|
|
A-154 North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
A-418 A Type Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
A-418 B Type Ore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
RPR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
COST OF SALES
The Company expects cost of sales in fiscal 2012 to be approximately
$265 million. Included in this amount is depreciation and amortization
of approximately $80 million at an assumed average Canadian/US dollar
exchange rate of $1.00. This increase in cost of sales as compared to
fiscal 2011 is expected to result primarily from an increase in the
proportion of underground ore mined.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
During fiscal 2012, HWDLP's 40% share of the planned capital
expenditures at the Diavik Diamond Mine is expected to be approximately
$62million at an assumed average Canadian/US dollar exchange rate of
$1.00. During the second quarter, HWDLP's share of capital expenditures
was $9.7 million.
EXPLORATION
The Company has additionally staked 226,000 acres of mineral claims on
the prospective geological trend to the southwest of the existing mine
site and is starting a small but important basal till drilling program
to assess the potential for new diamondiferous kimberlite pipes over
the coming years. On September 6, 2011, the Company announced that
Harry Winston Diamond Mines Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiary
6355137 Canada Inc. have entered into an option agreement with North
Arrow Minerals Inc.("North Arrow") and Springbok Holdings Inc.,
("Springbok") in regards to their Lac de Gras properties in the
Northwest Territories. Under the terms of the agreement, the two
properties collectively will form a "Joint Venture Property". In order
for the option to vest, the Company is to carry out exploration on the
Joint Venture Property, making expenditures of at least $5 million over
a five year period. Upon vesting, a joint venture will be formed, in
which the Company will hold a 55% interest, and North Arrow and
Springbok will equally share a 45% interest, in the entire Joint
Venture Property.
Luxury Brand
The luxury brand segment includes sales from Harry Winston salons, which
are located in prime markets around the world, including eight salons
in the United States: New York, Beverly Hills, Bal Harbour, Honolulu,
Las Vegas, Dallas, Chicago and Costa Mesa; five salons in Japan: Ginza,
Roppongi Hills, Osaka, Omotesando and Nagoya; two salons in Europe:
Paris andLondon; and four salons in Asia outside of Japan: Beijing,
Taipei, Hong Kong and Singapore.
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
$
|
132,770
|
|
$
|
81,897
|
|
$
|
132,661
|
|
$
|
80,169
|
|
$
|
66,901
|
|
$
|
65,078
|
|
$
|
70,165
|
|
$
|
54,063
|
|
$
|
214,667
|
|
$
|
131,979
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
82,564
|
|
|
43,009
|
|
|
79,569
|
|
|
39,726
|
|
|
31,390
|
|
|
31,568
|
|
|
39,230
|
|
|
24,908
|
|
|
125,573
|
|
|
62,958
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
50,206
|
|
|
38,888
|
|
|
53,092
|
|
|
40,443
|
|
|
35,511
|
|
|
33,510
|
|
|
30,935
|
|
|
29,155
|
|
|
89,094
|
|
|
69,021
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
|
|
37.8% |
|
|
47.5% |
|
|
40.0% |
|
|
50.4% |
|
|
53.1% |
|
|
51.5% |
|
|
44.1% |
|
|
53.9% |
|
|
41.5% |
|
|
52.3% |
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
43,392
|
|
|
34,769
|
|
|
47,894
|
|
|
35,051
|
|
|
33,185
|
|
|
32,078
|
|
|
35,594
|
|
|
29,610
|
|
|
78,161
|
|
|
65,263
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
6,814
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
$
|
5,198
|
|
$
|
5,392
|
|
$
|
2,326
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
$
|
(4,659)
|
|
$
|
(455)
|
|
$
|
10,933
|
|
$
|
3,758
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (i) |
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
EBITDA (ii) |
|
|
$
|
10,069
|
|
$
|
7,328
|
|
$
|
9,164
|
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
$
|
5,488
|
|
$
|
4,658
|
|
$
|
(1,377)
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
$
|
17,396
|
|
$
|
10,146
|
| (i) |
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of sales and selling,
general and administrative expenses.
|
| (ii) |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"). See "Non-GAAP Measure" on page 16.
|
Three Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoThree Months Ended July 31,
2010
LUXURY BRAND SALES
Sales for the second quarter were $132.8 million compared to $66.9
millionfor the comparable quarter of the prior year, an increase of
98% (81% at constant exchange rates). Sales in Asia increased 223% to
$72.9 million, European sales increased 24.6% to $30.8 million, and US
sales increased 48% to $29.1 million. Included in the second quarter
were $55.6 million of high-value transactions, which generally carry
lower-than-average gross margins.
LUXURY BRAND COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
Cost of sales for the luxury brand segment for the second quarter was
$82.6 million compared to $31.4 million for the comparable quarter of
the prior year. Gross margin for the quarter was $50.2 million or 37.8%
compared to $35.5 million or 53.1% for the second quarter of the prior
year. The decrease in gross margin resulted primarily from exceptional
high-value transactions during the second quarter, which carry
generally lower-than-average gross margins.
LUXURY BRAND SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
SG&A expenses increased by 31% to $43.4 million from $33.2 million in
the comparable quarter of the prior year (21% at constant exchange
rates). The increase was due primarily to higher advertising, marketing
and selling expenses, higher variable compensation expenses resulting
from higher sales and increased rent and building related expenses.
Fixed costs accounted for $8.3 million of the increase, while variable
expenses linked to higher volume of sales accounted for $1.9 million of
the increase. SG&A expenses include depreciation and amortization
expense of $3.2 million consistent with the comparable quarter of the
prior year.
Six Months Ended July 31, 2011 ComparedtoSix Months Ended July 31,
2010
LUXURY BRAND SALES
Sales for the six months ended July 31, 2011, were $214.7 million
compared to $132.0 millionfor the comparable period of the prior year,
an increase of 63% (48% at constant exchange rates). Sales in Asia
increased 112% to $97.8 million, US sales increased 57% to $65.5
million and European sales increased 16% to $51.4 million. During the
period there were $60.8 million of high-value transactions, which carry
generally lower-than-average gross margins.
LUXURY BRAND COST OF SALES AND GROSS MARGIN
Cost of sales for the luxury brand segment for the six months ended July
31, 2011, was $125.6 million compared to $63.0 million for the
comparable period of the prior year. Gross margin for the six months
ended July 31, 2011, was $89.1 million or 41.5% compared to $69.0
million or 52.3% for the comparable period of the prior year. The
decrease in gross margin resulted primarily from exceptional high-value
transactions during the period, which carry generally
lower-than-average gross margins.
LUXURY BRAND SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
SG&A expenses increased by 20% to $78.2 million from $65.3 million in
the comparable period of the prior year (11% at constant exchange
rate). The increase was due primarily to higher advertising, marketing
and selling expenses, higher variable compensation expenses resulting
from higher sales and increased rent and building related expenses.
Fixed costs accounted for $9.8 million of the increase, while variable
expenses linked to higher volume of sales accounted for $3.1 million of
the increase. SG&A expenses include depreciation and amortization
expense of $6.3 million consistent with the comparable period of the
prior year.
LUXURY BRAND SEGMENT OPERATIONAL UPDATE
During the six months ended July 31, 2011, the luxury brand segment
generated sales of $214.7 million, an increase of 63% over the
comparable period of the prior year at actual exchange rates. The
Company recorded significant high-value transactions of $60.8 million
during the six month period. Sales growth was achieved across all
geographic regions. The US market generated sales of $65.5 million, an
increase of 57% over the comparable quarter of the prior year. The US
market continues to benefit from strong tourist flows supported by a
weak US dollar. In Japan, sales of $33.0 million increased by 17% at
actual exchange rates and by 4% on a constant exchange rate basis over
the comparable period of the prior year. Asia excluding Japan had
sales of $64.8 million representing an increase of 262% at actual
exchange rates and positive 240% on a constant exchange basis over the
comparable period of the prior year. In Europe, sales of $51.4 million
were 16% higher at actual exchange rates and negative 2% on a constant
exchange basis over the comparable period of the prior year.
Harry Winston successfully launched the Lily Cluster jewelry collection
and the Midnight watch collection during the quarter, supported by a
global marketing campaign. Consumers responded positively to the new
collections.
The luxury brand segment's distribution network consists of 19 directly
operated salons, 2 licensed salons (in Manila, Philippines, and Kiev,
Ukraine) and 189 wholesale watch doors around the world.
Luxury Brand Segment Outlook
Although the current economic disruptions emanating primarily from the
US and Europe represent significant challenges, the Company is
optimistic that the introduction of new products supported by an
innovative advertising campaign will translate into increasing sales
and profitability.
The Company continues to focus on expanding its global distribution
network. A new directly operated salon will be opened in Shanghai,
China, in the fourth quarter as well as three licensed salons and 35
wholesale watch doors through the remainder of the fiscal year. A key
component of the luxury brand's growth strategy is the expansion of its
current salon network and wholesale distribution channel. The growth
target is to expand to approximately 35 directly operated salons, 15
licensed salons, and 300 wholesale doors by fiscal 2016.
On May 19, 2011, the Company announced that it had entered into a
business arrangement with Diamond Asset Advisors AG ("DAA"), which is
in the process of establishing a polished diamond investment fund (the
"Fund"). The Fund will be structured as a limited partnership with
total funding of up to $250 million, offering institutional investors
direct exposure to the wholesale market price of polished diamonds.
Under the terms of the Company's arrangement with the Fund, the
Company's expert diamond team will source diamonds for the Fund that
have the same high-quality characteristics that the luxury brand
segment uses in its jewelry and watches, with a portion of the diamonds
coming from the Company's existing inventory. The Fund will purchase
the diamonds and then consign them to the Company, which will act as
custodian. The Company will use the consigned polished diamonds in the
manufacturing of its jewelry and watches, paying the Fund when the
jewelry or watch is sold. The price paid by the Fund to replace the
sold polished diamonds will be used to determine the Fund's market
value. This arrangement will increase the inventory available to the
Company's expanding international salon network without additional
demands on working capital. The Fund is expected to raise the first
capital subscription of approximately $100 million from investors later
this fiscal year, with the remaining $150 million expected to be raised
over the following year, subject to market conditions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Working Capital
As at July 31, 2011, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of $139.9million compared to $108.7million at January 31,
2011. The Company had cash on hand and balances with banks of
$132.5million and short-term investments of $7.4million at July 31,
2011. During the quarter ended July 31, 2011, the Company reported cash
from operations of $40.1million compared to $2.4million in the
comparable quarter of the prior year.
Working capital increased to $396.1million at July 31, 2011 from
$328.6million at January 31, 2011. During the quarter, the Company
increased accounts receivable by $2.8 million, decreased other current
assets by $3.2 million, decreased inventory and supplies by
$38.0million, decreased trade and other payables by $54.7million and
increased employee benefit plans by $0.1 million.
The Company's liquidity requirements fluctuate from quarter to quarter
depending on, among other factors, the seasonality of production at the
Diavik Diamond Mine, seasonality of mine operating expenses, capital
expenditure programs, the number of rough diamond sales events
conducted during the quarter and the volume, size and quality
distribution of rough diamonds delivered from the Diavik Diamond Mine
in each quarter, along with the seasonality of sales and salon
expansion in the luxury brand segment. The Company's principal working
capital needs include investments in inventory, other current assets,
and trade and other payables and income taxespayable.
The Company assesses liquidity and capital resources on a consolidated
basis. The Company's requirements are for cash operating expenses,
working capital, contractual debt requirements and capital
expenditures. The Company believes that it will generate sufficient
liquidity to meet its anticipated requirements for the next twelve
months.
Financing Activities
The mining segment maintains a senior secured revolving credit facility
with Standard Chartered Bank that was increased from $100.0 million to
$125.0 million on February 28, 2011. At July 31, 2011, $50.0 million
was outstanding; this amount remains unchanged from January 31, 2011.
As at July 31, 2011, $1.6 million was outstanding under the Company's
revolving financing facility relating to its India subsidiary,
HarryWinston Diamond (India) Private Limited, compared to $nil at
January 31, 2011.
During the quarter ended July 31, 2011, the luxury brand subsidiary,
Harry Winston Inc., increased the amount outstanding on its secured
five-year revolving credit facility to $188.3 million from $165.0
million at January 31, 2011.
Investing Activities
During the second quarter, the Company purchased property, plant and
equipment of $14.5million, of which $12.6million was purchased for
the mining segment and $1.9 million for the luxury brand segment.
Contractual Obligations
The Company has contractual payment obligations with respect to
interest-bearing loans and borrowings and, through its participation in
the JointVenture, future site restoration costs at the Diavik Diamond
Mine level. Additionally, at the Joint Venture level, contractual
obligations exist with respect to operating purchase obligations, as
administered by DDMI, the operator of the mine. In order to maintain
its 40% ownership interest in the Diavik Diamond Mine, HWDLP is
obligated to fund 40% of the Joint Venture's total expenditures on a
monthly basis. HWDLP's current projected share of the planned capital
expenditures at the Diavik Diamond Mine, which are not reflected in the
table below, including capitalexpenditures for the calendar years 2011
to 2015, is approximately $140million assuming a Canadian/US average
exchange rate of $1.00 for the fiveyears. The most significant
contractual obligations for the ensuing five-year period can be
summarized as follows:
|
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
|
2-3
|
|
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (a)(b)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
383,454
|
|
$
|
104,563
|
|
$
|
|
254,138
|
|
$
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
$
|
|
19,585
|
|
Environmental and participation agreements incremental commitments (c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,171
|
|
|
86,112
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
Operating lease obligations (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,209
|
|
|
25,640
|
|
|
|
41,148
|
|
|
|
|
39,735
|
|
|
|
133,686
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
722,834
|
|
$
|
216,315
|
|
$
|
|
295,999
|
|
$
|
|
|
45,768
|
|
$
|
|
164,752
|
|
(a)
|
|
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings presented in the foregoing table
include current and long-term portions. The mining segment maintains a
senior secured revolving credit facility with Standard Chartered Bank
for $125.0 million. The facility has an initial maturity date of June
24, 2013 with two one-year extensions at the Company's option.There
are no scheduled repayments required before maturity. At July 31, 2011,
$50.0 million was outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 25, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount
of $70.0 million, maturing on August 25, 2011, as part of the
consideration for reacquiring its 9% indirect interest in the Diavik
Joint Venture (the "Kinross Buy Back Transaction") from Kinross. The
note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum and can be paid in cash.
On August 25, 2011, the Company paid the $70.0 million promissory note
plus accrued interest to Kinross from cash on hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has available a $45.0million revolving financing facility
(utilization in either US dollars or Euros) for inventory and
receivables funding in connection with marketing activities through its
Belgian subsidiary, HarryWinston Diamond International N.V., and its
Indian subsidiary, HarryWinston Diamond (India) Private Limited.
Borrowings under the Belgian facility bear interest at the bank's base
rate plus 1.5%. Borrowings under the Indian facility bear an interest
rate of 12.0%. At July 31, 2011, $nil and $1.6 million were outstanding
under this facility relating to its Belgian subsidiary, HarryWinston
Diamond International N.V., and its Indian subsidiary, HarryWinston
Diamond (India) Private Limited, respectively. The facility is
guaranteed by HarryWinston Diamond Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry Winston Inc. maintains a credit agreement with a syndicate of
banks for a $250.0million five-year revolving credit facility, which
expires on March 31, 2013. There are no scheduled repayments required
before maturity. At July 31, 2011, $188.3 million had been drawn
against this secured credit facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also included in long-term debt of Harry Winston Inc. is a 25-year loan
agreement for CHF 17.5 million ($21.6 million) used to finance the
construction of the Company's watch factory in Geneva, Switzerland. The
loan agreement is comprised of a CHF 3.5 million ($4.3 million) loan
and a CHF 14.0 million ($17.3 million) loan. The CHF 3.5 million loan
bears interest at a rate of 3.15% and matures on April 22, 2013. The
CHF14.0 million loan bears interest at a rate of 3.55% and matures on
January 31, 2033. At July 31, 2011, $19.3 million was outstanding. The
bank has a secured interest in the factory building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HarryWinston Japan, K.K. maintains unsecured credit agreements with two
banks, amounting to JPY1,215 million ($15.8million). HarryWinston
Japan, K.K. also maintains a secured credit agreement amounting to
JPY575million ($7.5million). This facility is secured by inventory
owned by HarryWinston Japan, K.K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company's first mortgageon real property has scheduled principal
payments of approximately $0.2 million quarterly, may be prepaid at any
time, and matures on September 1, 2018. On July 31, 2011, $7.0 million
was outstanding on the mortgage payable.
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Interest on loans and borrowings is calculated at various fixed and
floating rates. Projected interest payments on the current debt
outstanding were based on interest rates in effect at July 31, 2011,
and have been included under interest-bearing loans and borrowings in
the table above. Interest payments for the next twelve months are
approximated to be $10.3million.
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
The Joint Venture, under environmental and other agreements, must
provide funding for the Environmental Monitoring Advisory Board. These
agreements also state that the Joint Venture must provide security
deposits for the performance by the Joint Venture of its reclamation
and abandonment obligations under all environmental laws and
regulations. Theoperator of the Joint Venture has fulfilled such
obligations for the security deposits by posting letters of credit of
which HWDLP's share as at July 31, 2011 was $84.3million based on its
40% ownership interest in the Diavik Diamond Mine. There can be no
assurance that the operator will continue its practice of posting
letters of credit in fulfillment of this obligation, in which event
HWDLP would be required to post its proportionate share of such
security directly, which would result in additional constraints on
liquidity. The requirement to post security for the reclamation and
abandonment obligations may be reduced to the extent of amounts spent
by the Joint Venture on those activities. The Joint Venture has also
signed participation agreements with various native groups. These
agreements are expected to contribute to the social, economic and
cultural well-being of area Aboriginal bands. The actual cash outlay
for the Joint Venture's obligations under these agreements is not
anticipated to occur until later in the life of the DiavikDiamond
Mine.
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Operating lease obligations represent future minimum annual rentals
under non-cancellable operating leases for HarryWinston Inc. salons
and office space, and long-term leases for property, land, office
premises and a fuel tank farm for the Diavik Diamond Mine.
|
Non-GAAP Measure
In addition to discussing earnings measures in accordance with IFRS, the
MD&A provides the following non-GAAP measure, which is also used by
management to monitor and evaluate the performance of the Company and
its business segments.
The term EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization) does not have a standardized meaning according to IFRS
and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by
other issuers. The Company defines EBITDA as sales minus cost of sales
and selling, general and administrative expenses, meaning it represents
operating profit before depreciation and amortization.
EBITDA is a measure commonly reported and widely used by investors and
analysts as an indicator of the Company's operating performance and
ability to incur and service debt and as a valuation metric. EBITDA
margin is defined as the ratio obtained by dividing EBITDA by sales.
CONSOLIDATED
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23,100
|
|
$
|
4,685
|
|
$
|
21,245
|
|
$
|
14,830
|
|
$
|
29,932
|
|
$
|
2,341
|
|
$
|
(3,082)
|
|
$
|
(4,941)
|
|
$
|
27,785
|
|
$
|
32,273
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
20,716
|
|
|
20,291
|
|
|
24,635
|
|
|
18,657
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
14,200
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
11,208
|
|
|
41,007
|
|
|
33,715
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
$
|
43,816
|
|
$
|
24,976
|
|
$
|
45,880
|
|
$
|
33,487
|
|
$
|
49,447
|
|
$
|
16,541
|
|
$
|
15,176
|
|
$
|
6,267
|
|
$
|
68,792
|
|
$
|
65,988
|
MINING SEGMENT
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
16,286
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
$
|
16,047
|
|
$
|
9,438
|
|
$
|
27,606
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
$
|
(4,486)
|
|
$
|
16,852
|
|
$
|
28,515
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
17,461
|
|
|
17,083
|
|
|
20,669
|
|
|
15,428
|
|
|
16,352
|
|
|
10,975
|
|
|
14,976
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
34,544
|
|
|
27,327
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
$
|
33,747
|
|
$
|
17,649
|
|
$
|
36,716
|
|
$
|
24,866
|
|
$
|
43,958
|
|
$
|
11,884
|
|
$
|
16,553
|
|
$
|
3,359
|
|
$
|
51,396
|
|
$
|
55,842
|
LUXURY BRAND SEGMENT
(expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
(quarterly results are unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDN GAAP
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months
ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
6,814
|
|
$
|
4,119
|
|
$
|
5,198
|
|
$
|
5,392
|
|
$
|
2,326
|
|
$
|
1,432
|
|
$
|
(4,659)
|
|
$
|
(455)
|
|
$
|
10,933
|
|
$
|
3,758
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
3,282
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
$
|
10,069
|
|
$
|
7,328
|
|
$
|
9,164
|
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
$
|
5,488
|
|
$
|
4,658
|
|
$
|
(1,377)
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
$
|
17,396
|
|
$
|
10,146
|
Subsequent Event
On August 25, 2011, the Company paid the $70.0 million promissory note
plus accrued interest owing to Kinross from cash on hand. The
promissory note was issued to Kinross on August 25, 2010, as part of
the consideration for reacquiring Kinross's 9% indirect interest in the
Diavik Joint Venture.
Risks and Uncertainties
Harry Winston Diamond Corporation is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties as a result of its operations. Inaddition to the other
information contained in this MD&A and the Company's other publicly
filed disclosure documents, readers should give careful consideration
to the following risks, each of which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business prospects or financial condition.
Nature of Mining
The operation of the Diavik Diamond Mine is subject to risks inherent in
the mining industry, including variations in grade and other geological
differences, unexpected problems associated with required water
retention dikes, water quality, surface and underground conditions,
processing problems, equipment performance, accidents, labour disputes,
risks relating to the physical security of the diamonds, force majeure
risks and natural disasters. Particularly with underground mining
operations, inherent risks include variations in rock structure and
strength as it impacts on mining method selection and performance,
de-watering and water handling requirements, achieving the required
paste backfill strengths, and unexpected local ground conditions.
Hazards, such as unusual or unexpected rock formations, rock bursts,
pressures, collapses, flooding or other conditions, may be encountered
during mining. Such risks could result in personal injury or fatality;
damage to or destruction of mining properties, processing facilities or
equipment; environmental damage; delays, suspensions or permanent
reductions in mining production; monetary losses; and possible legal
liability.
The Diavik Diamond Mine, because of its remote northern location and
access only by winter road or by air, is subject to special climate and
transportation risks. These risks include the inability to operate or
to operate efficiently during periods of extreme cold, the
unavailability of materials and equipment, and increased transportation
costs due to the late opening and/or early closure of the winter road.
Such factors can add to the cost of mine development, production and
operation and/or impair production and mining activities, thereby
affecting the Company's profitability.
Nature of Joint Arrangement with DDMI
HWDLP holds an undivided 40% interest in the assets, liabilities and
expenses of the Diavik Diamond Mine and the Diavik group of mineral
claims. The Diavik Diamond Mine and the exploration and development of
the Diavik group of mineral claims is a joint arrangement between DDMI
(60%) and HWDLP (40%), and is subject to the risks normally associated
with the conduct of joint ventures and similar joint arrangements.
These risks include the inability to exert influence over strategic
decisions made in respect of the Diavik Diamond Mine and the Diavik
group of mineral claims. Byvirtue of DDMI's 60% interest in the Diavik
Diamond Mine, it has a controlling vote in virtually all Joint Venture
management decisions respecting the development and operation of the
Diavik Diamond Mine and the development of the Diavik group of mineral
claims. Accordingly, DDMI is able to determine the timing and scope of
future project capital expenditures, and therefore is able to impose
capital expenditure requirements on HWDLP that the Company may not have
sufficient cash to meet. A failure to meet capital expenditure
requirements imposed by DDMI could result in HWDLP's interest in the
Diavik Diamond Mine and the Diavik group of mineral claims being
diluted.
Diamond Prices and Demand for Diamonds
The profitability of the Company is dependent upon production from the
Diavik Diamond Mine and on the results of the operations of its luxury
brand operations. Each, in turn, is dependent in significant part upon
the worldwide demand for and price of diamonds. Diamond prices
fluctuate and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of
the Company, including worldwide economic trends, particularly in the
US, Japan, China and India, worldwide levels of diamond discovery and
production, and the level of demand for, and discretionary spending on,
luxury goods such as diamonds and jewelry. Low or negative growth in
the worldwide economy, renewed or additional credit market disruptions,
natural disasters or the occurrence of further terrorist attacks or
similar activities creating disruptions in economic growth could result
in decreased demand for luxury goods such as diamonds and jewelry,
thereby negatively affecting the price of diamonds and jewelry.
Similarly, a substantial increase in the worldwide level of diamond
production or in diamonds available for sale through recommencement of
suspended mining activity or the release of stocks held back during
recent periods of low demand could also negatively affect the price of
diamonds. In each case, such developments could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations.
Cash Flow and Liquidity
The Company's liquidity requirements fluctuate from quarter to quarter
and year to year depending on, among other factors, the seasonality of
production at the Diavik Diamond Mine, seasonality of mine operating
expenses, capital expenditure programs, the number of rough diamond
sales events conducted during the quarter and the volume, size and
quality distribution of rough diamonds delivered from the Diavik
Diamond Mine in each quarter, along with the seasonality of sales and
salon refurbishment and expansion in the luxury brand segment. The
Company's principal working capital needs include investments in
inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and accounts
payable and income taxes payable. There can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to meet each or all of its liquidity requirements.
A failure by the Company to meet its liquidity requirements could
result in the Company failing to meet its planned development
objectives, or in the Company being in default of a contractual
obligation, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business prospects or financial condition.
Economic Environment
The Company's financial results are tied to the global economic
conditions and their impact on levels of consumer confidence and
consumer spending. The global markets have experienced the impact of a
significant US and international economic downturn since the fall of
2008. This has restricted the Company's growth opportunities both
domestically and internationally, and a return to a recession or weak
recovery, due to recent disruptions in financial markets in the US and
the European Union or otherwise, the 2011 disaster in Japan and
political upheavals in the Middle East, could cause the Company to
experience further revenue declines across both of its business
segments due to deteriorated consumer confidence and spending, and a
decrease in the availability of credit, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business prospects or financial
condition. The Company monitors economic developments in the markets in
which it operates and uses this information in its continuous strategic
and operational planning in an effort to adjust its business in
response to changing economic conditions.
Currency Risk
Currency fluctuations may affect the Company's financial performance.
Diamonds are sold throughout the world based principally on the
USdollar price, and although the Company reports its financial results
in US dollars, a majority of the costs and expenses of the
DiavikDiamond Mine are incurred in Canadian dollars. Further, the
Company has a significant deferred income tax liability that has been
incurred and will be payable in Canadian dollars. The Company's
currency exposure relates primarily to expenses and obligations
incurred by it in Canadian dollars and, secondarily, to revenues of
Harry Winston Inc. in currencies other than the US dollar. The
appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the US dollar, and the
depreciation of other currencies against the US dollar, therefore, will
increase the expenses of the Diavik Diamond Mine and the amount of the
Company's Canadian dollar liabilities relative to the revenue
theCompany will receive from diamond sales, and will decrease the US
dollar revenues received by Harry Winston Inc. Fromtime to time, the
Company may use a limited number of derivative financial instruments to
manage its foreign currencyexposure.
Licences and Permits
The operation of the Diavik Diamond Mine and exploration on the Diavik
property requires licences and permits from the Canadian government.
The Diavik Diamond Mine Type "A" Water Licence was renewed by the
regional Wek'eezhii Land and Water Board to October31, 2015. While the
Company anticipates that DDMI, the operator of the Diavik Diamond Mine,
will be able to renew this licence and other necessary permits in the
future, there can be no guarantee that DDMI will be able to do so or
obtain or maintain all other necessary licences and permits that may be
required to maintain the operation of the Diavik Diamond Mine or to
further explore and develop the Diavikproperty.
Regulatory and Environmental Risks
The operation of the Diavik Diamond Mine, exploration activities at the
Diavik Project and the manufacturing of jewelry and watches are subject
to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment, exploration, development, production, taxes, labour
standards, occupational health, waste disposal, mine safety,
manufacturing safety and other matters. New laws and regulations,
amendments to existing laws and regulations, or more stringent
implementation or changes in enforcement policies under existing laws
and regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company by
increasing costs and/or causing a reduction in levels of production
from the DiavikDiamond Mine and in the manufacture of jewelry and
watches. As well, as the Company's international operations expand, it
or its subsidiaries become subject to laws andregulatory regimes that
could differ materially from those under which they operate in Canada
and the US.
Mining and manufacturing are subject to potential risks and liabilities
associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste
products occurring as a result of mining and manufacturing operations.
To the extent that the Company's operations are subject to uninsured
environmental liabilities, the payment of such liabilities could have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
Climate ChangeCanada ratified the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change in late 2002 and the Kyoto Protocol came
into effect in Canada in February 2005. The Canadian government has
established a number of policy measures in order to meet its emission
reduction guidelines. While the impact of these measures cannot be
quantified at this time, the likely effect will be to increase costs
for fossil fuels, electricity and transportation; restrict industrial
emission levels; impose added costs for emissions in excess of
permitted levels; and increase costs for monitoring and reporting.
Compliance with these initiatives could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations.
Resource and Reserve Estimates
The Company's figures for mineral resources and ore reserves on the
Diavik group of mineral claims are estimates, and no assurance can be
given that the anticipated carats will be recovered. The estimation of
reserves is a subjective process. Forecasts are based on engineering
data, projected future rates of production and the timing of future
expenditures, all of which are subject to numerous uncertainties and
various interpretations. The Company expects that its estimates of
reserves will change to reflect updated information as well as to
reflect depletion due to production. Reserve estimates may be revised
upward or downward based on the results of current and future drilling,
testing or production levels, and on changes in mine design. In
addition, market fluctuations in the price of diamonds or increases in
the costs to recover diamonds from the Diavik Diamond Mine may render
the mining of ore reserves uneconomical.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. Due to the uncertainty that may attach to inferred
mineral resources, there is no assurance that mineral resources at the
Diavik property will be upgraded to proven and probable ore reserves.
Insurance
The Company's business is subject to a number of risks and hazards,
including adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents,
labour disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, risks
relating to the physical security of diamonds and jewelry held as
inventory or in transit, changes in the regulatory environment and
natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions. Such
occurrences could result in damage to the Diavik Diamond Mine, personal
injury or death, environmental damage to the Diavik property, delays in
mining, the closing of Harry Winston Inc.'s manufacturing facilities or
salons, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although
insurance is maintained to protect against certain risks in connection
with the Diavik Diamond Mine and the Company's operations, the
insurance in place will not cover all potential risks. It may not be
possible to maintain insurance to cover insurable risks at economically
feasible premiums.
Fuel Costs
The Diavik Diamond Mine's expected fuel needs are purchased periodically
during the year for storage, and transportedto the mine site by way
ofthe winter road. These costs will increase if transportation by air
freight is required due to a shortened "winter road season" or
unexpectedly high fuel usage.
Thecost of the fuelpurchased is based on the then prevailingprice and
expensed into operating costs ona usage basis. TheDiavik Diamond Mine
currently has no hedges for its future anticipated fuel consumption.
Reliance on Skilled Employees
Production at the Diavik Diamond Mine is dependent upon the efforts of
certain skilled employees of DDMI. The loss of these employees or the
inability of DDMI to attract and retain additional skilled employees
may adversely affect the level of diamond production from the
DiavikDiamond Mine.
The Company's success in marketing rough diamonds and operating the
business of Harry Winston Inc. is dependent on the services of key
executives and skilled employees, as well as the continuance of key
relationships with certain third parties, such as diamantaires. The
loss of these persons or the Company's inability to attract and retain
additional skilled employees or to establish and maintain relationships
with required third parties may adversely affect its business and
future operations in marketing diamonds and operating its luxury brand
segment.
Expansion and Refurbishment of the Existing Salon Network
A key component of the Company's luxury brand strategy in recent years
has been the expansion of its salon network. The Company currently
expects to expand its retail salon network to 35 salons (in total) and
300 wholesale doors worldwide by fiscal 2016. An additional objective
of the Company is to achieve compound annual growth rate in sales in
the mid-teens in the luxury brand segment and an operating profit in
the low to mid-teens in the luxury brand segment, in each case over the
five-year period from fiscal 2012 to 2016. Although the Company
considers these objectives to be reasonable, they are subject to a
number of risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that
these objectives will be realized. This strategy requires the Company
to make ongoing capital expenditures to build and open new salons, to
refurbish existing salons from time to time, and to incur additional
operating expenses in order to operate the new salons. To date, much of
this expansion has been financed by Harry Winston Inc. through
borrowings. The successful expansion of the Company's global salon
network, and achieving an increase in sales and in operating profit,
will depend on a variety of factors, including worldwide economic
conditions, market demand for luxury goods, the strength of the Harry
Winston brand and the availability of sufficient funding. There can be
no assurance that the expansion of the salon network will continue or
that the current expansion will prove successful in increasing annual
sales or earnings from the luxury brand segment, and the increased debt
levels resulting from this expansion could negatively impact the
Company's liquidity and its results from operations in the absence of
increased sales and earnings.
The Company has to date licensed two retail salons to operate under the
Harry Winston name and currently expects to increase the number of
licensed salons to 15 by fiscal 2016. There is no assurance that the
Company will be able to find qualified third parties to enter into
these licensing arrangements, or that the licensees will honour the
terms of the agreements. The conduct of licensees may have a negative
impact on the Company's distinctive brand name and reputation.
Competition in the Luxury Brand Segment
The Company is exposed to competition in the luxury brand market from
other luxury goods, diamond, jewelry and watch retailers. The ability
of Harry Winston Inc. to successfully compete with such luxury goods,
diamond, jewelry and watch retailers is dependent upon a number of
factors, including the ability to source high-end polished diamonds and
protect and promote its distinctive brand name and reputation. If
HarryWinston Inc. is unable to successfully compete in the luxury
jewelry segment, then the Company's results of operations will be
adversely affected.
Changes in Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over
FinancialReporting
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, there were no changes in the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
or internal control over financial reporting.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Management is often required to make judgments, assumptions and
estimates in the application of IFRS that have a significant impact on
the financial results of the Company. Certain policies are more
significant than others and are, therefore, considered critical
accounting policies. Accounting policies are considered critical if
they rely on a substantial amount of judgment (use of estimates) in
their application or if they result from a choice between accounting
alternatives and that choice has a material impact on the Company's
reported resultsor financial position. There have been no significant
changes to critical accounting estimates since the first quarter of
fiscal 2012.
Changes in Accounting Policies
The International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") has issued a new
standard, IFRS 9, "Financial Instruments" ("IFRS 9"), which will
ultimately replace IAS 39, "Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement" ("IAS 39"). IFRS 9 provides guidance on the classification
and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. This
standard becomes effective for the Company's fiscal year end beginning
February 1, 2013. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the
new standard on its financial statements.
IFRS 11, "Joint Arrangements" ("IFRS 11"), was issued by the IASB on May
12, 2011 and will replace IAS 31, "Interest in Joint Ventures". The new
standard will apply to the accounting for interests in joint
arrangements where there is joint control. Under IFRS 11, joint
arrangements are classified as either joint ventures or joint
operations. The structure of the joint arrangement will no longer be
the most significant factor in determining whether a joint arrangement
is either a joint venture or a joint operation. Proportionate
consolidations will no longer be allowed and will be replaced by equity
accounting. IFRS 11 is effective for the Company's fiscal year end
beginning February 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 11 on its results of
operations and financial position.
IFRS 13, "Fair Value Measurement" ("IFRS 13"), was also issued by the
IASB on May 12, 2011. The new standard makes IFRS consistent with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("US
GAAP") on measuring fair value and related fair value disclosures. The
new standard creates a single source of guidance for fair value
measurements. IFRS 13 is effective for the Company's fiscal year end
beginning February 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is assessing the impact of IFRS 13 on its consolidated financial
statements.
Outstanding Share Information
|
As at August 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited
|
|
Issued and outstanding shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,793,781
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,481,899
|
|
Fully diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,275,680
|
Additional Information
Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company's
most recently filed Annual Information Form,can be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and is also available on the Company's website at http://investor.harrywinston.com.
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS) (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
2011
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (note 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
139,881
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,693
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,032
|
|
|
|
|
22,788
|
|
Inventory and supplies (note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,204
|
|
|
|
|
403,212
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,034
|
|
|
|
|
38,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637,151
|
|
|
|
|
573,355
|
|
Property, plant and equipment - Mining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755,501
|
|
|
|
|
764,093
|
|
Property, plant and equipment - Luxury brand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,986
|
|
|
|
|
61,019
|
|
Intangible assets, net (note 7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,616
|
|
|
|
|
127,894
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
16,626
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,085
|
|
|
|
|
62,693
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
1,665,339
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,605,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
112,256
|
|
|
|
$
|
136,490
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,740
|
|
|
|
|
6,660
|
|
Employee benefit plans (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,682
|
|
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
Promissory note (note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Current portion of interest-bearing loans and borrowings (note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,350
|
|
|
|
|
24,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,028
|
|
|
|
|
244,743
|
|
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings (note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,972
|
|
|
|
|
237,621
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,393
|
|
|
|
|
301,980
|
|
Employee benefit plans (note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,716
|
|
|
|
|
50,130
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865,966
|
|
|
|
|
841,761
|
| Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
509,410
|
|
|
|
|
502,129
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,043
|
|
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,249
|
|
|
|
|
237,667
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,401
|
|
|
|
|
7,624
|
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799,103
|
|
|
|
|
763,653
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799,373
|
|
|
|
|
763,919
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
1,665,339
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,605,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Income Statements
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
222,378
|
|
$
|
153,728
|
|
$
|
366,310
|
|
$
|
267,728
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,177
|
|
|
85,798
|
|
|
246,629
|
|
|
161,509
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,201
|
|
|
67,930
|
|
|
119,681
|
|
|
106,219
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,101
|
|
|
37,998
|
|
|
91,896
|
|
|
73,946
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
29,932
|
|
|
27,785
|
|
|
32,273
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,183)
|
|
|
(2,985)
|
|
|
(9,166)
|
|
|
(5,865)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(781)
|
|
|
(76)
|
|
|
(993)
|
|
|
(103)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
322
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
(1,170)
|
|
Profit before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,507
|
|
|
28,068
|
|
|
18,078
|
|
|
25,457
|
|
Net income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,519
|
|
|
10,877
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
Net profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,988
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
Attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,986
|
|
$
|
13,043
|
|
$
|
13,582
|
|
$
|
15,180
|
|
Attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
4,148
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
4,924
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,688,002
|
|
|
76,639,693
|
|
|
84,491,901
|
|
|
76,635,651
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements ofComprehensiveIncome
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS) (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net profit
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,988
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on translation of net foreign operations
(net of tax of nil)
|
|
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instrument
(net of tax of $0.1 million for the three months and
$0.2million for the six months ended July 31, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
253
|
|
Actuarial loss on employee benefit plans (net of tax of nil)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(636)
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,519
|
|
$
|
21,070
|
|
$
|
29,363
|
|
$
|
21,751
|
|
Attributable to shareholders
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,517
|
|
$
|
16,922
|
|
$
|
29,359
|
|
$
|
16,827
|
|
Attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
4,148
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
4,924
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements ofChangesin Equity
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS) (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,207
|
|
$
|
426,753
|
|
$
|
502,129
|
|
$
|
426,593
|
|
Issued during the period
|
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
|
249
|
|
Transfer from contributed surplus on exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
509,410
|
|
|
426,842
|
|
|
509,410
|
|
|
426,842
|
|
Contributed surplus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
15,670
|
|
|
17,917
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
|
17,730
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
348
|
|
Transfer from contributed surplus on exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
(1,140)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(2,300)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
15,043
|
|
|
18,078
|
|
|
15,043
|
|
|
18,078
|
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
241,263
|
|
|
252,205
|
|
|
237,667
|
|
|
250,068
|
|
Net profit attributable to common shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
9,986
|
|
|
13,043
|
|
|
13,582
|
|
|
15,180
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
251,249
|
|
|
265,248
|
|
|
251,249
|
|
|
265,248
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
14,870
|
|
|
(4,802)
|
|
|
7,624
|
|
|
(2,570)
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on translation of net foreign operations
(net of tax of nil)
|
|
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
|
15,777
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
(net of tax of $0.1 million for the three months and
$0.2 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
253
|
|
Actuarial loss on employee benefit plans (net of tax of nil)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(636)
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
23,401
|
|
|
(923)
|
|
|
23,401
|
|
|
(923)
|
|
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
179,113
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
178,337
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4,148
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4,924
|
|
Distribution to Kinross
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(9,900)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(9,900)
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
173,361
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
173,361
|
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
$
|
799,373
|
|
$
|
882,606
|
|
$
|
799,373
|
|
$
|
882,606
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(EXPRESSED IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS) (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Three
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended
July 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
| Cash provided by (used in) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net profit
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,988
|
|
$
|
17,191
|
|
$
|
13,586
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
20,716
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
41,007
|
|
|
33,715
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
|
|
|
|
(771)
|
|
|
9,081
|
|
|
(3,419)
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
7,911
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
5,183
|
|
|
2,985
|
|
|
9,166
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
348
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
(725)
|
|
|
(1,189)
|
|
|
(192)
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
243
|
|
Income tax refund (paid), net
|
|
|
|
|
13,165
|
|
|
(16,083)
|
|
|
10,454
|
|
|
(17,568)
|
Change in non-cash operating working capital,
excluding taxes and finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
(16,302)
|
|
|
(31,099)
|
|
|
(57,516)
|
|
|
(22,677)
|
| Cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
40,057
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
22,107
|
|
|
27,164
|
| FINANCING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in interest-bearing loans and borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
(180)
|
|
|
(79)
|
|
|
(354)
|
|
|
(131)
|
|
Increase in revolving credit
|
|
|
|
|
67,719
|
|
|
136,749
|
|
|
85,604
|
|
|
162,175
|
|
Decrease in revolving credit
|
|
|
|
|
(57,690)
|
|
|
(78,209)
|
|
|
(58,007)
|
|
|
(90,242)
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
|
|
(3,689)
|
|
|
(2,188)
|
|
|
(5,197)
|
|
|
(4,008)
|
|
Issue of common shares, net of issue costs
|
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
|
249
|
|
Distribution to Kinross
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(9,900)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(9,900)
|
| Cash provided from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
7,223
|
|
|
46,462
|
|
|
27,027
|
|
|
58,143
|
| INVESTING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment - Mining
|
|
|
|
|
(12,649)
|
|
|
(10,711)
|
|
|
(25,084)
|
|
|
(20,008)
|
|
Property, plant and equipment - Luxury brand
|
|
|
|
|
(1,900)
|
|
|
(892)
|
|
|
(3,289)
|
|
|
(1,097)
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
(427)
|
|
|
(3,754)
|
|
|
(823)
|
|
|
(3,460)
|
| Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
(14,976)
|
|
|
(15,357)
|
|
|
(29,196)
|
|
|
(24,565)
|
|
Foreign exchange effect on cash balances
|
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
38,667
|
|
|
35,100
|
|
|
31,188
|
|
|
62,005
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
101,214
|
|
|
89,874
|
|
|
108,693
|
|
|
62,969
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,881
|
|
$
|
124,974
|
|
$
|
139,881
|
|
$
|
124,974
|
Change in non-cash operating working capital, excluding taxes and finance expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
(2,845)
|
|
|
(1,770)
|
|
|
(8,226)
|
|
|
(2,440)
|
|
Inventory and supplies
|
|
|
|
|
37,959
|
|
|
(34,132)
|
|
|
(24,436)
|
|
|
(59,106)
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
|
(4,291)
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
|
|
|
|
(54,726)
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
(27,172)
|
|
|
42,490
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
(6,717)
|
|
|
(299)
|
|
|
(6,774)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(16,302)
|
|
$
|
(31,099)
|
|
$
|
(57,516)
|
|
$
|
(22,677)
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
JULY 31, 2011 WITH COMPARATIVE FIGURES
(TABULAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS OF UNITED STATES DOLLARS, EXCEPT AS
OTHERWISE NOTED)
Note 1: Nature of Operations
Harry Winston Diamond Corporation (the "Company") is a diamond
enterprise with assets in the mining and luxury brand segments of the
diamond industry.
The Company's mining asset is an ownership interest in the Diavik group
of mineral claims. The Diavik Joint Venture (the "Joint Venture") is an
unincorporated joint arrangement between Diavik Diamond Mines Inc.
("DDMI") (60%) and HarryWinston Diamond Limited Partnership ("HWDLP")
(40%) where HWDLP holds an undivided 40% ownership interest in the
assets, liabilities and expenses of the Diavik Diamond Mine. DDMI is
the operator of the Diavik Diamond Mine. DDMI and HWDLP are
headquartered in Yellowknife, Canada. DDMI is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Rio Tinto plc of London, England, and Harry Winston Diamond Limited
Partnership is a wholly owned subsidiary of HarryWinston Diamond
Corporation of Toronto, Canada.
The Company also owns Harry Winston Inc., the premier fine jewelry and
watch retailer with select locations throughout the world. Its head
office is located in New York City, United States.
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with
current year's presentation.
The Company is incorporated and domiciled in Canada and its shares are
publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock
Exchange. The address of its registered office is Toronto, Ontario.
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have
been approved for issue by the Audit Committee on September 7, 2011.
Note 2: Basis of Preparation
| (a) |
|
Statement of compliance |
|
|
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards ("IFRS") International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 34,
"Interim Financial Reporting". The Company's first annual consolidated
financial statements under IFRS will be presented for the fiscal year
ending January 31, 2012. The accounting policies adopted in these
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are
consistent with the accounting policies the Company expects to adopt in
its IFRS consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending
January 31, 2012, and are based on IFRS as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") that the Company expects to be
applicable at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements do
not include all disclosures required by IFRS for annual consolidated
financial statements and accordingly should be read in conjunction with
the Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended January 31, 2011 presented under generally accepted accounting
principles in Canada (''Canadian GAAP'') and in conjunction with the
IFRS transition disclosures in Note 15 to these interim statements.
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared following the same accounting policies and methods
of computation as presented in the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements of April 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
| (b) |
|
Basis of measurement |
|
|
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following:
-
financial instruments held for trading are measured at fair value
through profit and loss
-
liabilities for RSU and DSU plans are measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
| (c) |
|
Currency of presentation |
|
|
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements are expressed
in United States dollars, consistent with the predominant functional
currency of the Company's operations. All financial information
presented in United States dollars has been rounded to the nearest
thousand.
|
Note 3: Changes in Accounting Policies
Standards issued but not yet effective
The following standards and interpretations have been issued but are not
yet effective and have not been early adopted in these financial
statements. These standards may result in consequential changes to the
accounting policies and other note disclosures.
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement Guidelines
|
|
(ii)
|
|
|
|
IAS 1 (Revised) - Presentation of Financial Statements
|
|
(iii)
|
|
|
|
IAS17 (Replacement) - Leases
|
|
(iv)
|
|
|
|
IAS 32 (Replacement) - Liabilities and Equity
|
|
(v)
|
|
|
|
IAS 19 (Replacement) - Employee Benefits and Pensions
|
|
(vi)
|
|
|
|
IAS 11 and IAS 18 (Replacement) - Revenue Recognition
|
|
(vii)
|
|
|
|
Improvements to IFRSs
|
The IASB has issued a new standard, IFRS 9, "Financial Instruments"
("IFRS 9"), which will ultimately replace IAS 39, "Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement" ("IAS 39"). IFRS 9 provides
guidance on the classification and measurement of financial assets and
financial liabilities. This standard becomes effective for the
Company's fiscal year end beginning February 1, 2013. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its financial
statements.
IFRS 11, "Joint Arrangements" ("IFRS 11") was issued by the IASB on May
12, 2011 and will replace IAS 31, "Interest in Joint Ventures". The new
standard will apply to the accounting for interests in joint
arrangements where there is joint control. Under IFRS 11, joint
arrangements are classified as either joint ventures or joint
operations. The structure of the joint arrangement will no longer be
the most significant factor in determining whether a joint arrangement
is either a joint venture or a joint operation. Proportionate
consolidations will no longer be allowed and will be replaced by equity
accounting. IFRS 11 is effective for the Company's fiscal year end
beginning February 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 11 on its results of
operations and financial position.
IFRS 13, "Fair Value Measurement" ("IFRS 13") was also issued by the
IASB on May 12, 2011. The new standard makes IFRS consistent with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("US
GAAP") on measuring fair value and related fair value disclosures. The
new standard creates a single source of guidance for fair value
measurements. IFRS 13 is effective for the Company's fiscal year end
beginning February 1, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Company
is assessing the impact of IFRS 13 on its consolidated financial
statements.
Note 4: Cash Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Cash on hand and balances with banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
132,475
|
|
|
$
|
107,993
|
|
Short-term investments (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,406
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Total cash resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
139,881
|
|
|
$
|
108,693
|
(a)Short-term investments are held in overnight deposits and money market
instruments with a maturity of 30 days.
Note 5: Inventory and Supplies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Luxury brand raw materials and work-in-progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
115,974
|
|
|
$
|
80,013
|
|
Luxury brand merchandise inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,763
|
|
|
|
226,358
|
|
Mining rough diamond inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,881
|
|
|
|
30,451
|
|
Mining supplies inventory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,586
|
|
|
|
66,390
|
|
Total inventory and supplies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
430,204
|
|
|
$
|
403,212
|
Total inventory and supplies is net of a provision for obsolescence of $
1.9 million ($2.9 million at January 31, 2011).
Note 6: Diavik Joint Venture
The following represents HWDLP's 40% proportionate interest in the Joint
Venture as at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
94,219
|
|
|
$
|
92,487
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,257
|
|
|
|
714,386
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,811
|
|
|
|
31,493
|
|
Non-current liabilities and participant's account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766,665
|
|
|
|
775,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Expenses net of interest income (a) (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
62,775
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
42,818
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
123,658
|
|
|
$
|
95,465
|
|
Cash flows resulting from (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,872)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,188)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,896)
|
|
|
|
(53,315)
|
|
Cash flows resulting from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,084
|
|
|
|
71,919
|
|
Cash flows resulting from (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,044)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,456)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,221)
|
|
|
|
(18,989)
|
| (a) |
|
The Joint Venture only earns interest income.
|
| (b) |
|
Expenses net of interest income for the three and six months ended July
31, 2011 of $nil and $0.1 million, respectively (three and six months
ended July 31, 2010 of $nil and $0.1 million, respectively)
|
HWDLP is contingently liable for DDMI's portion of the liabilities of
the Joint Venture, and to the extent HWDLP's participating interest has
increased because of the failure of DDMI to make a cash contribution
when required, HWDLP would have access to an increased portion of the
assets of the Joint Venture to settle these liabilities.
Note 7: Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
period |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 net |
|
|
|
2011 net |
|
Trademark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indefinite life
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
112,995
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
112,995
|
|
|
$
|
112,995
|
|
Drawings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indefinite life
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,365
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,365
|
|
|
|
12,365
|
|
Wholesale distribution network
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 months
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
(3,319)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,256
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
130,935
|
|
|
$
|
(3,319)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
127,616
|
|
|
$
|
127,894
|
Amortization expense for the six months ended July 31, 2011 was $0.3
million ($0.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2010). The
Company completed a valuation of its trademark and drawings as of
January 31, 2011 and concluded that there was no impairment of these
assets.
Note 8: Employee Benefit Plans
The employee benefit obligation reflected in the consolidated balance
sheet is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Defined benefit plan obligation - Harry Winston luxury brand segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
10,437
|
|
|
$
|
9,009
|
|
Defined contribution plan obligation - Harry Winston luxury brand
segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Defined contribution plan obligation - Harry Winston mining segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Defined contribution plan obligation - Diavik Diamond Mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
RSU and DSU plans (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
Total employee benefit plan obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
$
|
14,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
$
|
7,287
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,682
|
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
Total employee benefit plan obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
14,539
|
|
|
$
|
14,665
|
The amounts recognized in the consolidated income statement in respect
of employee benefit plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Defined benefit pension plan - Harry Winston luxury brand segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
Defined contribution plan - Harry Winston luxury brand segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
Defined contribution plan - Harry Winston mining segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Defined contribution plan - Diavik Diamond Mine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
RSU and DSU plans (note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2,776
|
Note 9: Interest-Bearing Loans and Borrowings
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011 |
|
January 31, 2011 |
|
Mining segment credit facilities
|
|
|
$
|
48,938
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Mining segment promissory note
|
|
|
|
68,970
|
|
70,000
|
|
Harry Winston Inc. credit facilities
|
|
|
|
207,519
|
|
181,715
|
|
First mortgage on real property
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
7,048
|
|
Bank advances
|
|
|
|
24,866
|
|
22,902
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
171
|
|
Total interest-bearing loans and borrowings
|
|
|
|
357,322
|
|
331,836
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
(96,350)
|
|
(94,215)
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,972
|
$
|
237,621
|
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Nominal interest rate |
|
|
Date of maturity |
|
|
Carrying amount at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
Face value at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
Borrower |
|
Secured bank loan
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
3.75%
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
|
$188.3 million
|
|
|
$188.3 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Inc.
|
|
Secured bank loan
|
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
3.15%
|
|
|
April 22, 2013
|
|
|
$4.3 million
|
|
|
$4.3 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston S.A.
|
|
Secured bank loan
|
|
|
CHF
|
|
|
3.55%
|
|
|
January 31, 2033
|
|
|
$15.0 million
|
|
|
$15.0 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston S.A.
|
|
Secured bank loan
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
4.01%
|
|
|
June 24, 2013
|
|
|
$50.0 million
|
|
|
$50.0 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Diamond Corporation and
Harry Winston Diamond Mines Ltd.
|
|
First mortgage on real property
|
|
|
CDN
|
|
|
7.98%
|
|
|
September 1, 2018
|
|
|
$7.0 million
|
|
|
$7.0 million
|
|
|
6019838 Canada Inc.
|
|
Promissory note
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
5.00%
|
|
|
August 25, 2011
|
|
|
$70.0 million
|
|
|
$70.0 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Diamond Corporation
|
|
Secured bank advance
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Due on demand
|
|
|
$nil
|
|
|
$nil
|
|
|
Harry Winston Diamond International N.V.
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
12.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.6 million
|
|
|
$1.6 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Diamond (India)
Private Limited
|
|
Secured bank advance
|
|
|
YEN
|
|
|
2.25%
|
|
|
August 22, 2011
|
|
|
$7.5 million
|
|
|
$7.5 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Japan, K.K.
|
|
Unsecured bank advance
|
|
|
YEN
|
|
|
2.98%
|
|
|
August 31, 2011
|
|
|
$8.1 million
|
|
|
$8.1 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Japan, K.K.
|
|
Unsecured bank advance
|
|
|
YEN
|
|
|
2.98%
|
|
|
August 22, 2011
|
|
|
$7.7 million
|
|
|
$7.7 million
|
|
|
Harry Winston Japan, K.K.
|
On February 28, 2011, the Company increased the mining segment senior
secured revolving credit facility with Standard Chartered Bank by $25.0
million to $125.0 million.
On August 25, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount
of $70.0 million, maturing on August 25, 2011, as part of the
consideration for reacquiring Kinross Gold Corporation's ("Kinross") 9%
indirect interest in the Diavik Joint Venture (the "Kinross Buy Back
Transaction") from Kinross. On August 25, 2011, the Company paid the
$70.0 million promissory note plus accrued interest to Kinross from
cash on hand.
Note 10: Share Capital
| (a) |
|
Authorized |
|
|
Unlimited common shares without par value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance, January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,159,851
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
502,129
|
|
Shares issued for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,981
|
|
Transfer from contributed surplus on exercise of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,793,781
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
509,410
|
| RSU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of units |
|
Balance, January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,946
|
|
Awards and payouts during the year (net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSU awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,991
|
|
RSU payouts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,963)
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DSU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of units |
|
Balance, January 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,214
|
|
Awards and payouts during the year (net)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSU awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,598
|
|
DSU payouts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,127)
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,685
|
During the period, the Company granted 66,991 RSUs (net of forfeitures)
and 19,598 DSUs under an employee and director incentive compensation
program, respectively. The RSU and DSU Plans are full value phantom
shares that mirror the value of Harry Winston Diamond Corporation's
publicly traded common shares.
Grants under the RSU Plan are on a discretionary basis to employees of
the Company subject to Board of Directors approval. The RSUs granted
vest one-third on March 31 and one-third on each anniversary
thereafter. The vesting of grants of RSUs is subject to special rules
for a change in control, death and disability. The Company shall pay
out cash on the respective vesting dates of RSUs and redemption dates
of DSUs.
Only non-executive directors of the Company are eligible for grants
under the DSU Plan. Each DSU grant vests immediately on the grant date.
The expenses related to the RSUs and DSUs are accrued based on fair
value. This expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over each
vesting period.
Note 11: Commitments and Guarantees
| (a) |
Environmental agreements |
|
Through negotiations of environmental and other agreements, the Joint
Venture must provide funding for the Environmental Monitoring Advisory
Board. HWDLP anticipates its share of this funding requirement will be
approximately $0.2 million for calendar 2011. Further funding will be
required in future years; however, specific amounts have not yet been
determined. These agreements also state that the Joint Venture must
provide security deposits for the performance by the Joint Venture of
its reclamation and abandonment obligations under all environmental
laws and regulations. HWDLP's share of the letters of credit
outstanding posted by the operator of the Joint Venture with respect to
the environmental agreements as at July 31, 2011, was $84.3 million.
The agreement specifically provides that these funding requirements
will be reduced by amounts incurred by the Joint Venture on reclamation
and abandonment activities.
|
|
| (b) |
Participation agreements |
|
The Joint Venture has signed participation agreements with various
native groups. These agreements are expected to contribute to the
social, economic and cultural well-being of the Aboriginal bands. The
agreements are each for an initial term of twelve years and shall be
automatically renewed on terms to be agreed for successive periods of
six years thereafter until termination. The agreements terminate in the
event that the mine permanently ceases to operate. HarryWinston
Diamond Corporation's share of the Joint Venture's participation
agreements as at July 31, 2011 was $1.8 million.
|
|
| (c) |
Commitments |
|
Commitments include the cumulative maximum funding commitments secured
by letters of credit of the Joint Venture's environmental and
participation agreements at HWDLP's 40% ownership interest, before any
reduction of future reclamation activities; and future minimum annual
rentals under non-cancellable operating and capital leases for luxury
brand salons and corporate office space, and long-term leases for
property, land, office premises and a fuel tank farm at the Diavik
Diamond Mine; and are asfollows:
|
|
|
2012
|
$
|
111,752
|
|
2013
|
|
107,835
|
|
2014
|
|
106,905
|
|
2015
|
|
112,071
|
|
2016
|
|
107,207
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
232,857
|
Note 12: Capital Management
The Company's capital includes cash and cash equivalents, short-term
debt, long-term debt and equity, which includes issued common shares,
contributed surplus and retained earnings.
The Company's primary objective with respect to its capital management
is to ensure that it has sufficient cash resources to maintain its
ongoing operations, to provide returns to shareholders and benefits for
other stakeholders, and to pursue growth opportunities. To meet these
needs, the Company may from time to time raise additional funds through
borrowing and/or the issuance of equity or debt or by securing
strategic partners, upon approval by the Board of Directors. The Board
of Directors reviews and approves any material transactions out of the
ordinary course of business, including proposals on acquisitions or
other major investments or divestitures, as well as annual capital and
operating budgets.
The Company assesses liquidity and capital resources on a consolidated
basis. The Company's requirements are for cash operating expenses,
working capital, contractual debt requirements and capital
expenditures. The Company believes that it will generate sufficient
liquidity to meet its anticipated requirements for the next twelve
months.
Note 13: Financial Instruments
The Company has various financial instruments comprising cash and cash
equivalents, cash collateral and cash reserves, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bank advances, promissory
note and long-term debt.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and balances with
banks and short-term investments held in overnight deposits with a
maturity on acquisition of less than 90 days. Cash and cash
equivalents, which are designated as held-for-trading, are carried at
fairvalue based on quoted market prices and are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy established by the International
Accounting Standards Board.
The fair value of accounts receivable is determined by the amount of
cash anticipated to be received in the normal course of business from
the financial asset.
The promissory note is short term in nature; hence the fair value of
this instrument at July 31, 2011 is considered to approximate its
carrying value.
The Company's interest-bearing loans and borrowings are fully secured;
hence the fair values of these instruments at July 31, 2011 are
considered to approximate their carrying value.
The carrying values of these financial instruments are as follows:
|
July 31, 2011 |
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
|
fair value |
|
value |
|
fair value |
|
value |
| Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
139,881
|
$
|
139,881
|
$
|
108,693
|
$
|
108,693
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
31,032
|
|
31,032
|
|
22,788
|
|
22,788
|
|
$
|
170,913
|
$
|
170,913
|
$
|
131,481
|
$
|
131,481
|
| Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
$
|
112,256
|
$
|
112,256
|
$
|
136,490
|
$
|
136,490
|
|
Promissory note
|
|
70,000
|
|
70,000
|
|
70,000
|
|
70,000
|
|
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
|
|
287,322
|
|
287,322
|
|
261,836
|
|
261,836
|
|
$
|
469,578
|
$
|
469,578
|
$
|
468,326
|
$
|
468,326
|
Note 14: Segmented Information
The Company operates in two segments within the diamond industry, mining
and luxury brand, for the three and six months ended July 31, 2011.
The mining segment consists of the Company's rough diamond business.
This business includes the 40% ownership interest in the Diavik group
of mineral claims and the sale of rough diamonds.
The luxury brand segment consists of the Company's ownership in Harry
Winston Inc. This segment consists of the marketing of fine jewelry and
watches on a worldwide basis.
| For the three months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
Mining |
|
Luxury brand |
|
Total |
| Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
89,608
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
89,608
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
29,058
|
|
29,058
|
|
Europe
|
|
-
|
|
30,780
|
|
30,780
|
|
Asia (a) |
|
-
|
|
72,932
|
|
72,932
|
|
Total sales
|
|
89,608
|
|
132,770
|
|
222,378
|
| Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
16,802
|
|
77
|
|
16,879
|
|
All other costs
|
|
50,811
|
|
82,487
|
|
133,298
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
67,613
|
|
82,564
|
|
150,177
|
| Gross margin |
|
21,995
|
|
50,206
|
|
72,201
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
24.5% |
|
37.8% |
|
32.5% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and related expenses
|
|
777
|
|
32,977
|
|
33,754
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
4,932
|
|
10,415
|
|
15,347
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
5,709
|
|
43,392
|
|
49,101
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
16,286
|
|
6,814
|
|
23,100
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(3,787)
|
|
(1,396)
|
|
(5,183)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
(781)
|
|
-
|
|
(781)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
78
|
|
5
|
|
83
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
846
|
|
(558)
|
|
288
|
|
Segmented profit before income taxes
|
$
|
12,642
|
$
|
4,865
|
$
|
17,507
|
| Segmented assets as at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
983,625
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
983,625
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
426,721
|
|
426,721
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
|
33,536
|
|
221,457
|
|
254,993
|
|
$
|
1,017,161
|
$
|
648,178
|
$
|
1,665,339
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
12,649
|
$
|
1,900
|
$
|
14,549
|
| Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
$
|
(3,408)
|
$
|
2,637
|
$
|
(771)
|
(a)Sales to one significant customer in the luxury brand segment totalled
$45.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2011.
.
| For the three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Mining |
|
Luxury brand |
|
Total |
| Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
86,827
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
86,827
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
19,640
|
|
19,640
|
|
Europe
|
|
-
|
|
24,704
|
|
24,704
|
|
Asia
|
|
-
|
|
22,557
|
|
22,557
|
|
Total sales
|
|
86,827
|
|
66,901
|
|
153,728
|
| Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
15,722
|
|
80
|
|
15,802
|
|
All other costs
|
|
38,686
|
|
31,310
|
|
69,996
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
54,408
|
|
31,390
|
|
85,798
|
| Gross margin |
|
32,419
|
|
35,511
|
|
67,930
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
37.3% |
|
53.1% |
|
44.2% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and related expenses
|
|
831
|
|
24,484
|
|
25,315
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
3,982
|
|
8,701
|
|
12,683
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
4,813
|
|
33,185
|
|
37,998
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
27,606
|
|
2,326
|
|
29,932
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(1,341)
|
|
(1,644)
|
|
(2,985)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
(76)
|
|
-
|
|
(76)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
43
|
|
111
|
|
154
|
|
Foreign exchange gain
|
|
898
|
|
145
|
|
1,043
|
|
Segmented profit before income taxes
|
$
|
27,130
|
$
|
938
|
$
|
28,068
|
| Segmented assets as at July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
1,000,758
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,000,758
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
411,292
|
|
411,292
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
|
13,596
|
|
170,747
|
|
184,343
|
|
$
|
1,014,354
|
$
|
582,039
|
$
|
1,596,393
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
10,711
|
$
|
892
|
$
|
11,603
|
| Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
$
|
9,293
|
$
|
(212)
|
$
|
9,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For the six months ended July 31, 2011 |
|
Mining |
|
Luxury brand |
|
Total |
| Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
151,643
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
151,643
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
65,452
|
|
65,452
|
|
Europe
|
|
-
|
|
51,367
|
|
51,367
|
|
Asia (a) |
|
-
|
|
97,848
|
|
97,848
|
|
Total sales
|
|
151,643
|
|
214,667
|
|
366,310
|
| Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
33,232
|
|
157
|
|
33,389
|
|
All other costs
|
|
87,824
|
|
125,416
|
|
213,240
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
121,056
|
|
125,573
|
|
246,629
|
| Gross margin |
|
30,587
|
|
89,094
|
|
119,681
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
20.2% |
|
41.5% |
|
32.7% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and related expenses
|
|
1,426
|
|
59,298
|
|
60,724
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
12,309
|
|
18,863
|
|
31,172
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
13,735
|
|
78,161
|
|
91,896
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
16,852
|
|
10,933
|
|
27,785
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(6,480)
|
|
(2,686)
|
|
(9,166)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
(993)
|
|
-
|
|
(993)
|
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
155
|
|
186
|
|
341
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
(131)
|
|
242
|
|
111
|
|
Segmented profit before income taxes
|
$
|
9,403
|
$
|
8,675
|
$
|
18,078
|
| Segmented assets as at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
983,625
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
983,625
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
426,721
|
|
426,721
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
|
33,536
|
|
221,457
|
|
254,993
|
|
$
|
1,017,161
|
$
|
648,178
|
$
|
1,665,339
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
25,084
|
$
|
3,289
|
$
|
28,373
|
| Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
$
|
(7,963)
|
$
|
4,544
|
$
|
(3,419)
|
(a)Sales to one significant customer in the luxury brand segment totalled
$45.0 million for the six months ended July 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| For the six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Mining |
|
Luxury brand |
|
Total |
| Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
135,749
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
135,749
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
41,680
|
|
41,680
|
|
Europe
|
|
-
|
|
44,138
|
|
44,138
|
|
Asia
|
|
-
|
|
46,161
|
|
46,161
|
|
Total sales
|
|
135,749
|
|
131,979
|
|
267,728
|
| Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
26,068
|
|
160
|
|
26,228
|
|
All other costs
|
|
72,483
|
|
62,798
|
|
135,281
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
98,551
|
|
62,958
|
|
161,509
|
| Gross margin |
|
37,198
|
|
69,021
|
|
106,219
|
| Gross margin (%) |
|
27.4% |
|
52.3% |
|
39.7% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and related expenses
|
|
1,396
|
|
45,918
|
|
47,314
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
7,287
|
|
19,345
|
|
26,632
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
8,683
|
|
65,263
|
|
73,946
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
28,515
|
|
3,758
|
|
32,273
|
|
Finance expense
|
|
(2,654)
|
|
(3,211)
|
|
(5,865)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
|
(103)
|
|
-
|
|
(103)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
114
|
|
208
|
|
322
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
(1,497)
|
|
327
|
|
(1,170)
|
|
Segmented profit before income taxes
|
$
|
24,375
|
$
|
1,082
|
$
|
25,457
|
| Segmented assets as at July 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
$
|
1,000,758
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
1,000,758
|
|
United States
|
|
-
|
|
411,292
|
|
411,292
|
|
Other foreign countries
|
|
13,596
|
|
170,747
|
|
184,343
|
|
$
|
1,014,354
|
$
|
582,039
|
$
|
1,596,393
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$
|
20,008
|
$
|
1,097
|
$
|
21,105
|
| Other significant non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
$
|
2,622
|
$
|
421
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15: Explanation of Transition to IFRS
As stated in Note 2(a), these are the Company's second consolidated
interim financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The accounting policies described in Note 3 of the April 30, 2011
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been
applied in preparing: the interim financial statements for the three
and six months ended July 31, 2011, and the comparative information
presented in these interim financial statements for both the three and
six months ended July 31, 2010. In preparing these interim financial
statements, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in
financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. An
explanation of how the transition from Canadian GAAP to IFRS has
affected the Company's financial position and financial performance is
set out in the following tables and the notes that accompany the
tables.
Explanation of Transition to IFRS: Reconciliation of Equity
|
|
|
|
| (in thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
| (unaudited) |
|
Ref. |
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS |
|
IFRS |
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
124,974
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
124,974
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
26,118
|
|
-
|
|
26,118
|
|
Inventory and supplies
|
|
|
375,835
|
|
-
|
|
375,835
|
|
Other current assets
|
(b)
|
|
41,072
|
|
(7,515)
|
|
33,557
|
|
|
|
567,999
|
|
(7,515)
|
|
560,484
|
Property, plant and equipment
- Mining
|
(c)
|
|
791,163
|
|
(18,673)
|
|
772,490
|
Property, plant and equipment
- Luxury brand
|
|
|
58,348
|
|
-
|
|
58,348
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
128,519
|
|
-
|
|
128,519
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
18,149
|
|
-
|
|
18,149
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
(b)
|
|
48,511
|
|
9,892
|
|
58,403
|
| Total assets |
|
$ |
1,612,689 |
$ |
(16,296) |
$ |
1,596,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables
|
(d)
|
$
|
124,113
|
$
|
(4,986)
|
$
|
119,127
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
(d)
|
|
-
|
|
6,037
|
|
6,037
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
-
|
|
32,508
|
|
Bank advances
|
(d)
|
|
23,995
|
|
(23,995)
|
|
-
|
Interest-bearing loans and
borrowings
|
(d)
|
|
1,211
|
|
24,204
|
|
25,415
|
|
|
|
181,827
|
|
1,260
|
|
183,087
|
Interest-bearing loans and
borrowings
|
(d)
|
|
231,884
|
|
155
|
|
232,039
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
(e)
|
|
3,158
|
|
3,988
|
|
7,146
|
|
Provisions
|
(f)
|
|
42,383
|
|
2,416
|
|
44,799
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
(g)
|
|
287,831
|
|
(41,115)
|
|
246,716
|
| Total liabilities |
|
|
747,083 |
|
(33,296) |
|
713,787 |
| Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
426,842
|
|
-
|
|
426,842
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
18,078
|
|
-
|
|
18,078
|
|
Retained earnings
|
(h)
|
|
217,837
|
|
47,411
|
|
265,248
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
(i)
|
|
30,728
|
|
(31,652)
|
|
(924)
|
|
Total shareholders' equity
|
|
|
693,485
|
|
15,759
|
|
709,244
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
(j)
|
|
172,121
|
|
1,241
|
|
173,362
|
| Total equity |
|
|
865,606 |
|
17,000 |
|
882,606 |
| Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,612,689 |
$ |
(16,296) |
$ |
1,596,393 |
Explanation of Transition to IFRS: Reconciliation of Profit
| (in thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
For the three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
For the six months ended July 31, 2010 |
| (unaudited) |
|
Ref. |
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS |
|
IFRS |
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS |
|
IFRS |
| Sales |
|
$ |
153,728 |
$ |
-
|
$ |
153,728 |
$ |
267,728 |
$ |
-
|
$ |
267,728 |
|
Cost of sales
|
(k)
|
|
86,797
|
|
(999)
|
|
85,798
|
|
163,489
|
|
(1,980)
|
|
161,509
|
| Gross margin |
|
|
66,931 |
|
999 |
|
67,930 |
|
104,239 |
|
1,980 |
|
106,219 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
37,998
|
|
-
|
|
37,998
|
|
73,946
|
|
-
|
|
73,946
|
| Operating profit |
|
|
28,933 |
|
999 |
|
29,932 |
|
30,293 |
|
1,980 |
|
32,273 |
|
Finance expenses
|
(l)
|
|
(2,483)
|
|
(502)
|
|
(2,985)
|
|
(4,867)
|
|
(998)
|
|
(5,865)
|
|
Exploration costs
|
(m)
|
|
-
|
|
(76)
|
|
(76)
|
|
-
|
|
(103)
|
|
(103)
|
|
Finance and other income
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
(n)
|
|
3,319
|
|
(2,276)
|
|
1,043
|
|
(8,473)
|
|
7,303
|
|
(1,170)
|
| Profit (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
29,923 |
|
(1,855) |
|
28,068 |
|
17,275 |
|
8,182 |
|
25,457 |
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
-
|
|
1,797
|
|
2,311
|
|
-
|
|
2,311
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
(o)
|
|
7,317
|
|
1,763
|
|
9,080
|
|
2,923
|
|
119
|
|
3,042
|
| Net profit (loss) |
|
$ |
20,809 |
$ |
(3,618) |
$ |
17,191 |
$ |
12,041 |
$ |
8,063 |
$ |
20,104 |
| Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
$
|
16,490
|
$
|
(3,447)
|
$
|
13,043
|
$
|
7,837
|
$
|
7,343
|
$
|
15,180
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
(171)
|
|
4,148
|
|
4,204
|
|
720
|
|
4,924
|
| Net profit (loss) |
|
$ |
20,809 |
$ |
(3,618) |
$ |
17,191 |
$ |
12,041 |
$ |
8,063 |
$ |
20,104 |
| Earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
$ |
(0.05) |
$ |
0.17 |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.20 |
| Fully diluted |
|
$ |
0.21 |
$ |
(0.04) |
$ |
0.17 |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.10 |
$ |
0.20 |
|
Weighted average number of share outstanding
|
|
|
76,639,693
|
|
76,639,693
|
|
76,639,693
|
|
76,635,651
|
|
76,635,651
|
|
76,635,651
|
Explanation of Transition to IFRS: Reconciliation of Comprehensive
Income
| (in thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
For the three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
For the six months ended July 31, 2010 |
| (unaudited) |
|
Ref. |
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS |
|
IFRS |
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
Effect of Transition to IFRS |
|
IFRS |
| Net profit (loss) - as above |
|
$ |
20,809 |
$ |
(3,618) |
$ |
17,191 |
$ |
12,041 |
$ |
8,063 |
$ |
20,104 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on translation of net foreign operations
|
|
|
3,784
|
|
-
|
|
3,784
|
|
2,030
|
|
-
|
|
2,030
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instrument
|
|
|
95
|
|
-
|
|
95
|
|
253
|
|
-
|
|
253
|
|
Actuarial loss on employee benefit plans
|
(e)(i)
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(636)
|
|
(636)
|
| Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
24,688 |
$ |
(3,618) |
$ |
21,070 |
$ |
14,324 |
$ |
7,427 |
$ |
21,751 |
| Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
$
|
20,369
|
$
|
(3,447)
|
$
|
16,922
|
$
|
10,120
|
$
|
6,707
|
$
|
16,827
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
(171)
|
|
4,148
|
|
4,204
|
|
720
|
|
4,924
|
| Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
24,688 |
$ |
(3,618) |
$ |
21,070 |
$ |
14,324 |
$ |
7,427 |
$ |
21,751 |
References to the reconciliation of equity and profit
(a)Reclassification of assets
To conform to IFRS presentation requirements, certain asset balances
have been reclassified to current or non-current asset accounts.
(b)Other current assets
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Reclassification of assets
|
See (a)
|
$
|
(9,892)
|
|
Deferred tax impact on intra-group transfer of assets
|
(i)
|
|
2,377
|
|
Net decrease in other current assets
|
$
|
(7,515)
|
(i)Under IFRS, deferred taxes are recognized for the difference in tax
bases between jurisdictions as a result of an intra-group transfer of
assets. The deferred tax component under IFRS is computed using the tax
rate applicable to the purchaser, whereas the seller's tax rate was
applied under Canadian GAAP.
During the three months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
resulted in a $0.1 million reduction in deferred income tax asset and
increase in deferred income tax expense.
During the six months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
resulted in a $0.5 million reduction in deferred income tax asset and
increase in deferred income tax expense.
(c)Property, plant and equipment - Mining
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
(i)
|
$
|
(17,753)
|
|
Remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation
|
See (f)(i)
|
|
(920)
|
|
Total decrease in property, plant and equipment - Mining
|
$
|
(18,673)
|
(i)Under Canadian GAAP, the Company's policy on exploration
expenditures incurred is to capitalize and to amortize using the
units-of-production method. For IFRS purposes, the Company's accounting
policy on exploration expenditures is to expense unless the exploration
activity relates to proven and probable reserves.
For the three months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
increased mining capital assets by $0.4 million, decreased cost of
goods sold by approximately $0.5 million, and increased exploration
costs nominally, reflecting the net impact of reversing Canadian GAAP
depreciation on capitalized exploration costs, partially offset by the
expensing of exploration costs incurred in the quarter. Nominal changes
were also made to deferred income tax liabilities, non-controlling
interest and deferred income tax expense.
For the six months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
increased mining capital assets by $0.9 million, decreased cost of
goods sold by approximately $1.0 million, and increased exploration
costs by $0.1 million, reflecting the net impact of reversing Canadian
GAAP depreciation on capitalized exploration costs, partially offset by
the expensing of exploration costs incurred. Nominal changes were also
made to deferred income tax liabilities, non-controlling interest and
deferred income tax expense.
(d)Reclassification of liabilities
To conform to IFRS presentation requirements, various liability balances
have been reclassified.
(e)Employee benefit plans
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Retrospective application of IAS 19 employee benefits
|
(i)
|
$
|
5,402
|
|
Reclassification of liabilities
|
See (d)
|
|
(1,414)
|
|
Net increase in employee benefit plans
|
$
|
3,988
|
(i)Under Canadian GAAP, actuarial gains or losses for defined benefit
plans that exceeded the corridor threshold (10% of the greater of the
obligation and fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the
period) were recognized over the remaining average service life of
active employees. For IFRS purposes, the Company's accounting policy is
to recognize its actuarial gains and losses immediately in other
comprehensive income, and has retrospectively applied this approach at
the date of transition.
For the six months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
resulted in a $0.6 million increase to the defined benefit plan
obligation and a corresponding charge to other comprehensive income,
reflecting the recognition of actuarial losses. A nominal change was
made to deferred income tax liabilities.
(f)Provisions
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation
|
(i)
|
$
|
2,416
|
(i)The Company has elected to utilize the IFRS 1 optional exemption
relating to "Changes in decommissioning, restoration and similar
liabilities" in preparing its opening balance sheet under IFRS. There
was no further remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation from
the amount on February 1, 2010.
(g)Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Recognition of new deferred tax balances
|
(i)
|
$
|
(31,239)
|
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
See (c)(i)
|
|
(5,230)
|
|
Retrospective application of IAS 19 employee benefits
|
See (e)(i)
|
|
(2,550)
|
|
Remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation
|
See (f)(i)
|
|
(985)
|
|
Revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities
|
(ii)
|
|
(1,111)
|
|
Total decrease in deferred income tax liabilities
|
$
|
(41,115)
|
(i)Under IFRS, in the determination of temporary differences, the
carrying value of non-monetary assets and liabilities is translated
into the functional currency at the historical rate and compared to its
tax value translated into the functional currency at the current rate.
The resulting temporary difference (measured in the functional
currency) is then multiplied by the appropriate tax rate to determine
the related deferred tax balance.
Under Canadian GAAP, in the determination of temporary differences
related to non-monetary assets and liabilities, the temporary
differences computed in local currency are multiplied by the
appropriate tax rate. The resulting future income tax amount is then
translated into the Company's functional currency if it is different
from the local currency.
For the three months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
resulted in a $3.3 million increase in deferred income tax liabilities
and a $3.3 million increase in deferred income tax expense. Net profit
attributable to non-controlling interest also decreased by $0.2
million.
For the six months ended July 31, 2010, the accounting under IFRS
resulted in a $6.9 million decrease in deferred income tax liabilities
and a $6.9 million increase in deferred income tax recovery. Net profit
attributable to non-controlling interest also increased by $0.5
million.
(ii)For the three months ended July 31, 2010, the above IFRS
adjustments to deferred income tax liabilities required a revaluation
of the account balance resulting in a $0.5 million increase in deferred
income tax liabilities and a corresponding increase in deferred income
tax expense. Net profit attributable to non-controlling interest also
decreased nominally.
For the six months ended July 31, 2010, the above IFRS adjustments to
deferred income tax liabilities required a revaluation of the account
balance resulting in a $1.1 million reduction in deferred income tax
liabilities and a corresponding increase in deferred income tax
recovery. Net profit attributable to non-controlling interest also
increased nominally.
(h)Retained earnings
The effect of all IFRS adjustments has increased (decreased) retained
earnings as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Reset of cumulative translation differences
|
See (i)(i)
|
$
|
28,800
|
|
Recognition of new deferred tax balances
|
See (g)(i)
|
|
29,182
|
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
See (c)(i)
|
|
(11,835)
|
|
Deferred tax impact on intra-group transfer of assets
|
See (b)(i)
|
|
2,377
|
|
Remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation
|
See (f)(i)
|
|
(2,152)
|
|
Revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities
|
See (g)(ii)
|
|
1,039
|
|
Net increase in retained earnings
|
$
|
47,411
|
(i)Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Reset of cumulative translation differences
|
(i)
|
$
|
(28,800)
|
|
Retrospective application of IAS 19 employee benefits
|
See (e)(i)
|
|
(2,852)
|
|
Total decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income
|
$
|
(31,652)
|
(i)The Company has elected to utilize the IFRS 1 optional exemption
relating to "Cumulative translation differences" in preparing its
opening balance sheet under IFRS. Through application of this exemption
on transition date, existing cumulative translation differences as at
February 1, 2010 were reset to zero and retained earnings was increased
by $28.8 million.
(j)Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
July 31, 2010 |
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
See (c)(i)
|
|
(689)
|
|
Remeasurement of the asset retirement obligation
|
See (f)(i)
|
|
(199)
|
|
Recognition of new deferred tax balances
|
See (g)(i)
|
|
2,057
|
|
Revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities
|
See (g)(ii)
|
|
72
|
|
Net change in non-controlling interest
|
$
|
1,241
|
(k)Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Reclassification of accretion expense
|
|
|
(i)
|
$
|
(502)
|
$
|
(998)
|
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
|
|
See (c)(i)
|
|
(497)
|
|
(982)
|
|
Decrease in cost of sales
|
$
|
(999)
|
$
|
(1,980)
|
(i)In accordance with IFRIC 1, "Changes in Existing
Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities", accretion
expense is treated as interest expense whereas under Canadian GAAP it
had been recorded as a component of cost of sales.
(l)Finance expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Reclassification of accretion expense
|
|
|
See (k)(i)
|
$
|
(502)
|
$
|
(998)
|
(m)Exploration costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
|
|
See (c)(i)
|
$
|
(76)
|
$
|
(103)
|
(n)Decrease in foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Reclassification of foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
(i)
|
$
|
(2,276)
|
$
|
7,303
|
(i)Under Canadian GAAP, the foreign exchange difference from the
translation of deferred taxes was presented within the foreign exchange
gain/loss account. For IFRS reporting purposes, these foreign exchange
differences have been reclassified to deferred income tax
recovery/expense.
(o)Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref. |
|
Three months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Six months ended July 31, 2010 |
|
Derecognition of exploration costs capitalized
|
|
|
See (c)(i)
|
$
|
138
|
$
|
291
|
|
Recognition of new deferred income tax liability balances
|
|
|
See (g)(i)
|
|
3,303
|
|
(6,863)
|
|
Deferred tax impact on intra-group transfer of assets
|
|
|
See (b)(i)
|
|
84
|
|
499
|
|
Reclassification of foreign exchange
|
|
|
See (n)(i)
|
|
(2,276)
|
|
7,303
|
|
Revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
See (g)(ii)
|
|
514
|
|
(1,111)
|
|
Total increase in deferred income tax expense
|
$
|
1,763
|
$
|
119
|
SOURCE Harry Winston Diamond Corporation
|
|
|
|