these excluded liabilities. Additionally, in 2008 lawsuits were filed against Sensata Technologies Brazil alleging personal injuries suffered by individuals who were exposed to drinking water
allegedly contaminated by the Aterro disposal site. These matters are managed and controlled by Texas Instruments. Texas Instruments is defending these lawsuits, which are in early stages. Although Sensata Technologies Brazil cooperates with Texas
Instruments in this process, we do not anticipate incurring any non-reimbursable expenses related to the matters described above. Accordingly, no amounts have been accrued for these matters as of December 31, 2009.
Control Devices, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of one of our
U.S. operating subsidiaries acquired through our acquisition of the First Technology Automotive business, holds a post-closure license, along with GTE Operations Support, Inc., from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection with respect to a
closed hazardous waste surface impoundment located on real property and a facility owned by Control Devices in Standish, Maine. The post-closure license obligates GTE Operations Support to operate a pump and treatment process to reduce the levels of
chlorinated solvents in the groundwater under the property. The post-closure license obligates Control Devices to maintain the property and provide access to GTE Operations Support. We do not expect the costs to comply with the post-closure license
to be material. As a related but separate matter, pursuant to the terms of an Environmental Agreement dated July 6, 1994, GTE Operations Support retained liability and agreed to indemnify Control Devices for certain liabilities related to the
soil and groundwater contamination from the surface impoundment and an out-of-service leach field at the Standish, Maine facility, and Control Devices and GTE Operations Support have certain obligations related to the property and each other. The
site is contaminated primarily with chlorinated solvents. We do not expect the remaining cost associated with addressing the soil and groundwater contamination to be material.
We are subject to compliance with laws and regulations controlling the export of goods and services. Certain of
our products are subject to ITAR. These products represent an immaterial portion of our revenues and we have not exported an ITAR-controlled product. However, if in the future we decided to export ITAR-controlled products, such transactions would
require an individual validated license from the U.S. State Departments Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. The State Department makes licensing decisions based on type of product, destination of end use, end user and national security and
foreign policy. The length of time involved in the licensing process varies, but is currently less than three weeks. The license processing time could result in delays in the shipping of products. These laws and regulations are subject to change,
and any such change may require us to change technology or incur expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.
We are regularly involved in a number of claims and litigation matters in the ordinary course of business. Most of our litigation matters are
third-party claims for property damage allegedly caused by our products, but some involve allegations of personal injury or wrongful death. We believe that the ultimate resolution of the current litigation matters that are pending against us, except
potentially those matters described below, will not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Ford Speed Control Deactivation Switch Litigation: We are involved in a number of litigation matters relating to a pressure switch
that Texas Instruments sold to Ford Motor Company, or Ford, for several years until 2002. Ford incorporated the switch into a cruise control deactivation switch system that it installed in certain vehicles. Due to concerns that, in some
circumstances, this system and switch may cause fires, Ford issued seven separate recalls of vehicles in the United States between 1999 and October 23, 2009, which covered approximately fourteen million vehicles in the aggregate. Also, in
October 2009, Mazda issued a recall in the United States of 36,000 vehicles that Ford had manufactured for it which contained the system and switch, and in December 2009, Ford issued a recall of 528 vehicles imported into China by Ford.
In 2001, Texas Instruments received a demand from Ford for
reimbursement of costs related to the first recall in 1999, a demand that Texas Instruments rejected and that Ford has not subsequently pursued against us. Ford has never made such a demand to us, nor made demands of us related to the subsequent